IQQ vs. DGRO
IQQ (iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. IQQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
IQQ vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IQQ
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.46M | $42.46M | $42.46M |
IQQ vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IQQ iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | -1.68% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ and DGRO is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2026 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQ vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
IQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DGRO
IQQ vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQQ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQQ vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -35.10% | +30.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | -0.95% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -3.41% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility
IQQ vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.24% | 9.54% | +10.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 13.78% | +6.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 16.58% | +3.66% |
IQQ vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IQQ vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
IQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.92% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
IQQ iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQ and DGRO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IQQ.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 0.00% for IQQ.
IQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IQQ and 0.08% for DGRO.
Find the right allocation for IQQ and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer