IQM vs. FTXL
IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. IQM is actively managed, while FTXL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQM returned 15.99%/yr vs 26.40%/yr for FTXL. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IQM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
IQM vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a 19.53% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 68.79% return.
IQM
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -6.41%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- YTD
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 34.87%
- 3Y*
- 30.20%
- 5Y*
- 15.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 25.29%
FTXL
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -12.68%
- 6M
- 40.05%
- YTD
- 68.79%
- 1Y
- 129.18%
- 3Y*
- 45.38%
- 5Y*
- 26.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 28.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $142.99M | $99.08M | $87.36M | |
| $905.23K | $711.02K | $931.48K |
IQM vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 19.53% | 30.76% | 31.03% | 41.06% | -33.36% | 25.18% | 76.92% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 68.79% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 36.04% | 56.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQM and FTXL is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IQM and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
IQM vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQM
FTXL
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
IQM
FTXL
Industrials
IQM
FTXL
Utilities
IQM
FTXL
-
Energy
IQM
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
IQM
FTXL
-
Communication Services
IQM
FTXL
-
Healthcare
IQM
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
IQM
-
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
IQM
-
FTXL
-
Financial Services
IQM
-
FTXL
-
Real Estate
IQM
-
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQM vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
IQM
FTXL
IQM vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 3.98 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 16.86 | -11.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQM vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, roughly equal to the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.91% | -43.87% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.28% | -32.64% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.42% | -41.57% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.91% | -43.87% | -1.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.03% | -26.40% | +9.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.20% | -10.61% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.66% | 7.69% | -1.03% |
Volatility
IQM vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) is 15.54%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 18.15%. This indicates that IQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.54% | 18.15% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.13% | 39.70% | -8.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.17% | 46.19% | -10.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.64% | 38.25% | -7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.69% | 35.28% | -3.59% |
IQM vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQM vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.11% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQM and FTXL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (18.15%) compared to IQM (15.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQM dropped -44.91% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 26.40% vs 15.99% for IQM. On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IQM has been the lower-risk option at 15.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 26.40% return vs 15.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.
IQM is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IQM and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQM and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer