PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQLT vs. SCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQLT vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, IQLT has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 10.17%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.60% annualized return.


IQLT

1D
0.04%
1M
1.57%
YTD
9.81%
6M
11.22%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
10.17%

SCHP

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.48%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*
2.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQLT vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
9.81%25.42%1.54%18.73%-15.22%12.94%12.48%28.18%-10.76%24.04%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
1.42%6.76%1.95%3.91%-12.02%5.87%10.86%8.52%-1.78%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IQLT and SCHP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015

0.11

The correlation between IQLT and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IQLT vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQLT
SCHP

Financial Services

24.3%
0.0%

Industrials

17.3%

-

Technology

11.6%

-

Healthcare

9.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
100.0%

Basic Materials

7.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.0%

-

Energy

5.9%

-

Communication Services

4.3%

-

Utilities

3.8%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Financial Services

IQLT
24.3%
SCHP
0.0%

Industrials

IQLT
17.3%
SCHP

-

Technology

IQLT
11.6%
SCHP

-

Healthcare

IQLT
9.8%
SCHP

-

Consumer Cyclical

IQLT
8.1%
SCHP
100.0%

Basic Materials

IQLT
7.2%
SCHP

-

Consumer Defensive

IQLT
6.0%
SCHP

-

Energy

IQLT
5.9%
SCHP

-

Communication Services

IQLT
4.3%
SCHP

-

Utilities

IQLT
3.8%
SCHP

-

Real Estate

IQLT
1.6%
SCHP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQLT vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQLT
IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQLT vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQLTSCHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.45

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.18

7.41

-1.22

IQLT vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the SCHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQLT and SCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQLT vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and SCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQLTSCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.21%

-14.26%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-1.93%

-8.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-4.48%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.24%

-14.26%

-15.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.21%

-14.26%

-17.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.44%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-3.93%

-2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

0.64%

+2.10%

Volatility

IQLT vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.02%. This indicates that IQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQLTSCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

1.02%

+4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

2.24%

+10.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

3.30%

+11.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

6.12%

+10.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

5.59%

+11.41%

IQLT vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQLT vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than SCHP's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
2.12%2.33%2.87%2.27%3.14%2.24%1.61%2.28%2.72%2.36%2.91%2.78%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
3.99%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQLT and SCHP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQLT has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs SCHP's -14.26%.

On 10-year performance, IQLT leads with 10.17% vs 2.60% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IQLT has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 2.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.

SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 2.12% for IQLT.

IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.03% for SCHP.

SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQLT and SCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer