IQLT vs. SCHP
IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQLT returned 10.17%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for SCHP. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQLT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
IQLT vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, IQLT has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 10.17%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.60% annualized return.
IQLT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
IQLT vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 9.81% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 28.18% | -10.76% | 24.04% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.42% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQLT and SCHP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015 | 0.11 |
The correlation between IQLT and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IQLT vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQLT
SCHP
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
IQLT
SCHP
Industrials
IQLT
SCHP
-
Technology
IQLT
SCHP
-
Healthcare
IQLT
SCHP
-
Consumer Cyclical
IQLT
SCHP
Basic Materials
IQLT
SCHP
-
Consumer Defensive
IQLT
SCHP
-
Energy
IQLT
SCHP
-
Communication Services
IQLT
SCHP
-
Utilities
IQLT
SCHP
-
Real Estate
IQLT
SCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQLT vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
IQLT
SCHP
IQLT vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQLT | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.25 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.45 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 7.41 | -1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQLT vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQLT | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.21% | -14.26% | -17.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -1.93% | -8.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -4.48% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.24% | -14.26% | -15.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.21% | -14.26% | -17.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.44% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -3.93% | -2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 0.64% | +2.10% |
Volatility
IQLT vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.02%. This indicates that IQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQLT | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 1.02% | +4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 2.24% | +10.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 3.30% | +11.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 6.12% | +10.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 5.59% | +11.41% |
IQLT vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQLT vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than SCHP's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.12% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQLT and SCHP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQLT has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 10-year performance, IQLT leads with 10.17% vs 2.60% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IQLT has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 2.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 2.12% for IQLT.
IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.03% for SCHP.
SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQLT and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer