IQLT vs. QLV
IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) and QLV (FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Quality Factor funds - IQLT tracks the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net) while QLV tracks the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQLT returned 7.74%/yr vs 9.98%/yr for QLV. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IQLT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for QLV.
Performance
IQLT vs. QLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 9.01% return.
IQLT
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 1Y
- 24.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.64%
QLV
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $80.44M | $83.91M | $72.09M | |
| $433.57K | $400.63K | $648.84K |
IQLT vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 12.06% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 8.14% |
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 9.01% | 12.28% | 18.08% | 13.71% | -9.97% | 26.08% | 9.63% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQLT and QLV is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.72 |
The correlation between IQLT and QLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IQLT vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQLT
QLV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IQLT
QLV
Industrials
IQLT
QLV
Technology
IQLT
QLV
Healthcare
IQLT
QLV
Consumer Cyclical
IQLT
QLV
Basic Materials
IQLT
QLV
Consumer Defensive
IQLT
QLV
Energy
IQLT
QLV
Utilities
IQLT
QLV
Communication Services
IQLT
QLV
Real Estate
IQLT
QLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQLT vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank
IQLT
QLV
IQLT vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQLT | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 2.53 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 10.43 | -1.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQLT vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, roughly equal to the maximum QLV drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and QLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQLT | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.21% | -33.71% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -6.19% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -12.05% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.24% | -17.93% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.43% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -3.93% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 1.50% | +1.09% |
Volatility
IQLT vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 2.64%. This indicates that IQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQLT | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 2.64% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 5.96% | +6.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.13% | 7.88% | +7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 12.63% | +3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 16.43% | +0.34% |
IQLT vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQLT vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison
IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than QLV's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.38% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.60% | 1.74% | 0.96% | 1.24% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQLT and QLV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQLT has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to QLV (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs QLV's -33.71%.
On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 9.98% vs 7.74% for IQLT. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 9.98% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.
IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.52% for QLV.
IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.22% for QLV.
QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQLT and QLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer