PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQLT vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQLT vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.45% return.


IQLT

1D
0.87%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
6.95%
6M
9.15%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
9.47%

LVHI

1D
0.37%
1M
0.77%
YTD
11.45%
6M
13.55%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQLT vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
6.95%25.42%1.54%18.73%-15.22%12.94%12.48%28.18%-10.76%24.04%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
11.45%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IQLT and LVHI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016

0.66

The correlation between IQLT and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQLT vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQLT
LVHI

Financial Services

24.3%
23.6%

Industrials

17.3%
13.4%

Technology

11.6%
0.1%

Healthcare

9.8%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
5.3%

Basic Materials

7.2%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
8.7%

Energy

5.9%
17.4%

Communication Services

4.3%
5.8%

Utilities

3.8%
10.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.9%

Financial Services

IQLT
24.3%
LVHI
23.6%

Industrials

IQLT
17.3%
LVHI
13.4%

Technology

IQLT
11.6%
LVHI
0.1%

Healthcare

IQLT
9.8%
LVHI
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IQLT
8.1%
LVHI
5.3%

Basic Materials

IQLT
7.2%
LVHI
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

IQLT
6.0%
LVHI
8.7%

Energy

IQLT
5.9%
LVHI
17.4%

Communication Services

IQLT
4.3%
LVHI
5.8%

Utilities

IQLT
3.8%
LVHI
10.4%

Real Estate

IQLT
1.6%
LVHI
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQLT vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQLT
IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQLT vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQLTLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.58

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

4.84

-3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.50

19.99

-14.49

IQLT vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQLT and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQLTLVHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

3.10

-2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.42

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.81

-0.33

Drawdowns

IQLT vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, roughly equal to the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQLTLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.21%

-32.31%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-6.08%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-11.99%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.24%

-11.99%

-18.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-1.79%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-3.52%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

1.47%

+1.26%

Volatility

IQLT vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.35%. This indicates that IQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQLTLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

2.35%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

7.58%

+4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.67%

9.50%

+5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

11.07%

+5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

13.76%

+3.24%

IQLT vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQLT vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than LVHI's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
2.18%2.33%2.87%2.27%3.14%2.24%1.61%2.28%2.72%2.36%2.91%2.78%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.79%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQLT and LVHI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQLT has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.67% vs 6.84% for IQLT. On fees, IQLT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.67% return vs 6.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQLT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 2.18% for IQLT.

IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQLT and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer