IQLT vs. IMTM
IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) and IMTM (iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while IMTM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Momentum. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQLT returned 10.17%/yr vs 10.44%/yr for IMTM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.
Performance
IQLT vs. IMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly lower than IMTM's 11.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IQLT having a 10.17% annualized return and IMTM not far ahead at 10.44%.
IQLT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
IMTM
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 25.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
IQLT vs. IMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 9.81% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 28.18% | -10.76% | 24.04% |
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | 11.53% | 34.50% | 12.17% | 13.89% | -16.81% | 3.50% | 22.17% | 24.52% | -14.31% | 25.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQLT and IMTM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2015 | 0.83 |
The correlation between IQLT and IMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
IQLT vs. IMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQLT
IMTM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IQLT
IMTM
Industrials
IQLT
IMTM
Technology
IQLT
IMTM
Healthcare
IQLT
IMTM
Consumer Cyclical
IQLT
IMTM
Basic Materials
IQLT
IMTM
Consumer Defensive
IQLT
IMTM
Energy
IQLT
IMTM
Utilities
IQLT
IMTM
Communication Services
IQLT
IMTM
Real Estate
IQLT
IMTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQLT vs. IMTM — Risk / Return Rank
IQLT
IMTM
IQLT vs. IMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQLT | IMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.25 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.86 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 7.37 | -1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQLT vs. IMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, roughly equal to the maximum IMTM drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and IMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQLT | IMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.21% | -32.66% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -12.85% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -12.85% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.24% | -32.66% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.21% | -32.66% | +0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.22% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -7.43% | +1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 3.24% | -0.50% |
Volatility
IQLT vs. IMTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) is 5.41%, while iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that IQLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQLT | IMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 7.20% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 16.06% | -3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 17.97% | -2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 17.82% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 17.63% | -0.63% |
IQLT vs. IMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IQLT and IMTM have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Dividends
IQLT vs. IMTM - Dividend Comparison
IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than IMTM's 4.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | 4.22% | 4.70% | 2.93% | 2.29% | 2.68% | 2.51% | 0.97% | 2.13% | 2.36% | 1.92% | 2.75% | 1.56% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.12% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQLT and IMTM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMTM has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to IQLT (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs IMTM's -32.66%.
On 10-year performance, IMTM leads with 10.44% vs 10.17% for IQLT. Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. On volatility, IQLT has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IMTM has performed better with a 10.44% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQLT and IMTM have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.
IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 2.12% for IQLT.
IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IMTM is Momentum. IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum.
IMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQLT and IMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer