PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQLT vs. IMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQLT vs. IMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly lower than IMTM's 11.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IQLT having a 10.17% annualized return and IMTM not far ahead at 10.44%.


IQLT

1D
0.04%
1M
1.57%
YTD
9.81%
6M
11.22%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
10.17%

IMTM

1D
0.72%
1M
0.94%
YTD
11.53%
6M
12.83%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
10.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQLT vs. IMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
9.81%25.42%1.54%18.73%-15.22%12.94%12.48%28.18%-10.76%24.04%
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
11.53%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%25.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IQLT and IMTM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2015

0.83

The correlation between IQLT and IMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQLT vs. IMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQLT
IMTM

Financial Services

24.9%
28.6%

Industrials

17.8%
15.5%

Technology

11.8%
15.6%

Healthcare

9.2%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
1.8%

Basic Materials

7.2%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
2.1%

Energy

5.6%
10.0%

Utilities

3.7%
5.3%

Communication Services

3.2%
1.5%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.1%

Financial Services

IQLT
24.9%
IMTM
28.6%

Industrials

IQLT
17.8%
IMTM
15.5%

Technology

IQLT
11.8%
IMTM
15.6%

Healthcare

IQLT
9.2%
IMTM
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IQLT
8.2%
IMTM
1.8%

Basic Materials

IQLT
7.2%
IMTM
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

IQLT
6.4%
IMTM
2.1%

Energy

IQLT
5.6%
IMTM
10.0%

Utilities

IQLT
3.7%
IMTM
5.3%

Communication Services

IQLT
3.2%
IMTM
1.5%

Real Estate

IQLT
1.5%
IMTM
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQLT vs. IMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQLT
IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQLT vs. IMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQLTIMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.86

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.18

7.37

-1.18

IQLT vs. IMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the IMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQLT and IMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQLT vs. IMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, roughly equal to the maximum IMTM drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and IMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQLTIMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.21%

-32.66%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-12.85%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-12.85%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.24%

-32.66%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.21%

-32.66%

+0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.22%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-7.43%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

3.24%

-0.50%

Volatility

IQLT vs. IMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) is 5.41%, while iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that IQLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQLTIMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

7.20%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

16.06%

-3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

17.97%

-2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

17.82%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

17.63%

-0.63%

IQLT vs. IMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IQLT and IMTM have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

IQLT vs. IMTM - Dividend Comparison

IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than IMTM's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.22%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
2.12%2.33%2.87%2.27%3.14%2.24%1.61%2.28%2.72%2.36%2.91%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQLT and IMTM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMTM has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to IQLT (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs IMTM's -32.66%.

On 10-year performance, IMTM leads with 10.44% vs 10.17% for IQLT. Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. On volatility, IQLT has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMTM has performed better with a 10.44% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQLT and IMTM have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 2.12% for IQLT.

IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IMTM is Momentum. IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum.

IMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQLT and IMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer