IQLT vs. ACWV

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while ACWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQLT returned 10.04%/yr vs 7.52%/yr for ACWV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQLT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.

Performance

IQLT vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 3.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IQLT has outperformed ACWV with an annualized return of 10.04%, while ACWV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.52% annualized return.

IQLT

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 3.66%
• YTD: 10.27%
• 6M: 10.93%
• 1Y: 18.79%
• 3Y*: 13.94%
• 5Y*: 7.47%
• 10Y*: 10.04%

ACWV

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 3.19%
• 6M: 2.83%
• 1Y: 5.88%
• 3Y*: 9.79%
• 5Y*: 5.72%
• 10Y*: 7.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQLT vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF	10.27%	25.42%	1.54%	18.73%	-15.22%	12.94%	12.48%	28.18%	-10.76%	24.04%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	3.19%	11.04%	11.38%	8.23%	-10.36%	13.97%	3.04%	21.04%	-1.42%	18.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IQLT and ACWV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015	0.72

The correlation between IQLT and ACWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.76 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IQLT vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IQLT	ACWV
Financial Services	24.9%	13.2%
Industrials	17.8%	8.1%
Technology	11.8%	25.8%
Healthcare	9.2%	13.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	5.1%
Basic Materials	7.2%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	9.8%
Energy	5.6%	3.7%
Utilities	3.7%	7.3%
Communication Services	3.2%	11.9%
Real Estate	1.5%	0.6%

Return for Risk

IQLT vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQLT

IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 40
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 36
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 22
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQLT vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IQLT	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	0.76	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	1.11	+0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.13	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	0.93	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.90	2.81	+4.09

IQLT vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQLT and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IQLT vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQLT	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.21%	-28.82%	-3.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.38%	-6.37%	-4.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.18%	-7.56%	-5.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.24%	-18.14%	-12.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.21%	-28.82%	-3.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.12%	+2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-3.11%	-3.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	2.09%	+0.64%

Volatility

IQLT vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 2.14%. This indicates that IQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQLT	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	2.14%	+3.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.71%	5.61%	+7.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.96%	7.76%	+7.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.56%	10.24%	+6.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	12.31%	+4.67%

IQLT vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQLT vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than ACWV's 2.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	2.92%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF	3.65%	2.33%	2.87%	2.27%	3.14%	2.24%	1.61%	2.28%	2.72%	2.36%	2.91%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQLT and ACWV in my portfolio?

IQLT and ACWV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IQLT or ACWV?

IQLT has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to ACWV (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

Which ETF is better, IQLT or ACWV?

On 10-year performance, IQLT leads with 10.04% vs 7.52% for ACWV. On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IQLT or ACWV?

Over the 10-year period, IQLT has performed better with a 10.04% return vs 7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQLT or ACWV?

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQLT or ACWV?

IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 2.92% for ACWV.

What is the main difference between IQLT and ACWV?

IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ACWV is Large Cap Blend Equities. IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.20% for ACWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.