PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQDY vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQDY vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund (IQDY) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQDY achieves a 20.32% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's 8.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IQDY has outperformed OUSA with an annualized return of 11.47%, while OUSA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.54% annualized return.


IQDY

1D
1.67%
1M
2.88%
6M
12.03%
YTD
20.32%
1Y
38.36%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
11.47%
ALL TIME*
9.03%

OUSA

1D
1.27%
1M
3.71%
6M
5.67%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
10.54%
ALL TIME*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$942.98K$558.46K$430.71K
$880.04K$1.30M$1.44M

IQDY vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQDY
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund
20.32%37.44%5.97%23.45%-15.78%12.00%9.54%27.27%-20.04%24.06%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
8.45%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%25.03%-3.11%18.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IQDY and OUSA is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between IQDY and OUSA has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IQDY vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQDY
OUSA

Financial Services

26.3%
18.6%

Technology

24.3%
23.7%

Industrials

14.2%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
13.1%

Basic Materials

7.7%

-

Healthcare

5.3%
15.1%

Energy

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
7.4%

Communication Services

2.5%
10.3%

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Financial Services

IQDY
26.3%
OUSA
18.6%

Technology

IQDY
24.3%
OUSA
23.7%

Industrials

IQDY
14.2%
OUSA
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IQDY
8.8%
OUSA
13.1%

Basic Materials

IQDY
7.7%
OUSA

-

Healthcare

IQDY
5.3%
OUSA
15.1%

Energy

IQDY
4.8%
OUSA

-

Consumer Defensive

IQDY
2.9%
OUSA
7.4%

Communication Services

IQDY
2.5%
OUSA
10.3%

Utilities

IQDY
2.1%
OUSA

-

Real Estate

IQDY
1.2%
OUSA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQDY vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IQDY
IQDY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IQDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQDY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IQDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IQDY vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund (IQDY) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQDYOUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.28

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

1.93

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.26

6.75

+6.51

IQDY vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQDY Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQDY and OUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQDY vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQDY drawdown since its inception was -39.60%, which is greater than OUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQDY and OUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQDYOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.60%

-33.12%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-8.36%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.76%

-13.14%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.30%

-19.54%

-12.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.60%

-33.12%

-6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

0.00%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-3.50%

-5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.39%

+0.51%

Volatility

IQDY vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund (IQDY) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.81%. This indicates that IQDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQDYOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

3.81%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.79%

8.12%

+7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.82%

10.31%

+7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.14%

13.39%

+4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

15.20%

+3.08%

IQDY vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQDY has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQDY vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

IQDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than OUSA's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQDY
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund
2.92%3.26%6.95%6.45%5.52%3.89%2.62%3.85%5.97%3.57%3.77%4.08%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.33%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQDY and OUSA have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQDY has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to OUSA (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQDY dropped -39.60% vs OUSA's -33.12%.

On 10-year performance, IQDY leads with 11.47% vs 10.54% for OUSA. On fees, IQDY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IQDY has performed better with a 11.47% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQDY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

IQDY has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 1.33% for OUSA.

IQDY tracks Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IQDY and 0.48% for OUSA.

IQDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQDY and OUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer