PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQDG vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQDG vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQDG achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 8.62% return.


IQDG

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.47%
YTD
3.16%
6M
5.94%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
10.23%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
7.63%

NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQDG vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IQDG
WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund
3.16%24.19%-3.38%20.76%-19.97%12.28%16.58%30.03%-16.50%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.62%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IQDG and NTSX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.73

The correlation between IQDG and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQDG vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQDG
NTSX

Industrials

24.7%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

19.3%
10.1%

Financial Services

15.5%
12.3%

Technology

9.9%
35.1%

Healthcare

9.7%
8.4%

Communication Services

5.8%
12.5%

Basic Materials

5.3%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
5.5%

Energy

4.2%
3.5%

Utilities

0.9%
2.1%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.5%

Industrials

IQDG
24.7%
NTSX
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IQDG
19.3%
NTSX
10.1%

Financial Services

IQDG
15.5%
NTSX
12.3%

Technology

IQDG
9.9%
NTSX
35.1%

Healthcare

IQDG
9.7%
NTSX
8.4%

Communication Services

IQDG
5.8%
NTSX
12.5%

Basic Materials

IQDG
5.3%
NTSX
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

IQDG
4.5%
NTSX
5.5%

Energy

IQDG
4.2%
NTSX
3.5%

Utilities

IQDG
0.9%
NTSX
2.1%

Real Estate

IQDG
0.3%
NTSX
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQDG vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQDG
IQDG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IQDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IQDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQDG vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQDGNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.37

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

2.77

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

12.25

-8.88

IQDG vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQDG and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQDGNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

2.06

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.57

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.71

-0.26

Drawdowns

IQDG vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQDG drawdown since its inception was -34.97%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQDG and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQDGNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.97%

-31.34%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.35%

-9.16%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.12%

-16.82%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.97%

-31.34%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

-1.05%

-2.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-6.79%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

2.07%

+1.71%

Volatility

IQDG vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.39%. This indicates that IQDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQDGNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

3.39%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.30%

9.58%

+3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

12.31%

+3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.80%

17.04%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.53%

18.27%

-0.74%

IQDG vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQDG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQDG vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

IQDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IQDG
WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.14%2.28%2.60%1.76%4.18%2.67%1.65%1.95%1.96%1.71%1.35%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQDG and NTSX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQDG has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to NTSX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQDG dropped -34.97% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.69% vs 3.78% for IQDG. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 3.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IQDG.

IQDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

IQDG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IQDG and 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQDG and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer