PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQCY.L vs. MINV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQCY.L vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IQCY.L is traded in GBP, while MINV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MINV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQCY.L achieves a 30.19% return, which is significantly higher than MINV.L's 1.01% return.


IQCY.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
11.12%
YTD
30.19%
6M
28.29%
1Y
50.00%
3Y*
92.20%
5Y*
48.80%
10Y*

MINV.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.83%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.93%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
7.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQCY.L vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IQCY.L
Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
30.19%14.12%342.87%17.77%-16.95%17.73%34.37%
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
1.01%3.37%12.86%1.50%1.23%15.98%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IQCY.L and MINV.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between IQCY.L and MINV.L has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IQCY.L vs. MINV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQCY.L
MINV.L

Industrials

46.5%
9.1%

Technology

45.0%
21.3%

Utilities

3.2%
7.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
11.9%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
5.4%

Financial Services

0.5%
14.2%

Healthcare

0.1%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
10.8%

Energy

0.0%
4.2%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.7%

Industrials

IQCY.L
46.5%
MINV.L
9.1%

Technology

IQCY.L
45.0%
MINV.L
21.3%

Utilities

IQCY.L
3.2%
MINV.L
7.7%

Communication Services

IQCY.L
2.7%
MINV.L
11.9%

Basic Materials

IQCY.L
1.4%
MINV.L
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IQCY.L
0.7%
MINV.L
5.4%

Financial Services

IQCY.L
0.5%
MINV.L
14.2%

Healthcare

IQCY.L
0.1%
MINV.L
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

IQCY.L
0.0%
MINV.L
10.8%

Energy

IQCY.L
0.0%
MINV.L
4.2%

Real Estate

IQCY.L
0.0%
MINV.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQCY.L vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQCY.L
IQCY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IQCY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQCY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQCY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IQCY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQCY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MINV.L
MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQCY.L vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQCY.LMINV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.06

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.29

0.41

+4.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.92

1.10

+14.82

IQCY.L vs. MINV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQCY.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the MINV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQCY.L and MINV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQCY.LMINV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

0.32

+2.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.65

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.83

-0.44

Drawdowns

IQCY.L vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQCY.L drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, which is greater than MINV.L's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQCY.L and MINV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQCY.LMINV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-20.38%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-6.31%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.98%

-8.47%

-13.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.65%

-10.23%

-12.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-3.60%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-3.74%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.33%

+0.80%

Volatility

IQCY.L vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) at 2.55%. This indicates that IQCY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQCY.LMINV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

2.55%

+3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

5.92%

+6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

7.92%

+8.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

131.45%

9.70%

+121.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

119.50%

11.85%

+107.65%

IQCY.L vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQCY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQCY.L vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IQCY.L nor MINV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IQCY.L and MINV.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MINV.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MINV.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IQCY.L.

IQCY.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IQCY.L and 0.35% for MINV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQCY.L and MINV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer