IQCY.L vs. AGES.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IQCY.L (Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and AGES.L (iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - IQCY.L tracks the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD while AGES.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQCY.L returned 48.80%/yr vs 5.25%/yr for AGES.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQCY.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for AGES.L.

Performance

IQCY.L vs. AGES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) and iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IQCY.L is traded in GBP, while AGES.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AGES.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQCY.L achieves a 30.19% return, which is significantly higher than AGES.L's 1.98% return.

IQCY.L

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 11.12%
• YTD: 30.19%
• 6M: 28.29%
• 1Y: 50.00%
• 3Y*: 92.20%
• 5Y*: 48.80%
• 10Y*: —

AGES.L

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 1.98%
• 6M: 3.27%
• 1Y: 19.33%
• 3Y*: 10.98%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQCY.L vs. AGES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IQCY.L Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	30.19%	14.12%	342.87%	17.77%	-16.95%	17.73%	34.37%
AGES.L iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF	1.98%	18.29%	9.75%	2.81%	-3.90%	5.94%	28.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IQCY.L and AGES.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between IQCY.L and AGES.L has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IQCY.L vs. AGES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IQCY.L	AGES.L
Industrials	46.5%	-
Technology	45.0%	0.1%
Utilities	3.2%	-
Communication Services	2.7%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.4%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	0.7%	6.2%
Financial Services	0.5%	43.9%
Healthcare	0.1%	47.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Energy	0.0%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	1.0%

Return for Risk

IQCY.L vs. AGES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQCY.L

IQCY.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
IQCY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IQCY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
IQCY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
IQCY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IQCY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

AGES.L

AGES.L Risk / Return Rank: 51
AGES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
AGES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
AGES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 47
AGES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AGES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQCY.L vs. AGES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) and iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQCY.L	AGES.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	1.65	+1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.28	2.35	+1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.29	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.29	2.82	+2.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.92	9.67	+6.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQCY.L vs. AGES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQCY.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the AGES.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQCY.L and AGES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQCY.L	AGES.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	1.65	+1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.37	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.46	-0.08

Drawdowns

IQCY.L vs. AGES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQCY.L drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum AGES.L drawdown of -31.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQCY.L and AGES.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQCY.L	AGES.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.65%	-31.02%	+8.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.40%	-6.81%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.98%	-17.04%	-4.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.65%	-19.15%	-3.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-1.24%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-4.90%	-1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	1.99%	+1.14%

Volatility

IQCY.L vs. AGES.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L) at 3.03%. This indicates that IQCY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQCY.L	AGES.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	3.03%	+3.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.58%	9.09%	+3.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.06%	11.63%	+4.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	131.45%	14.13%	+117.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	119.50%	15.49%	+104.01%

IQCY.L vs. AGES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQCY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AGES.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQCY.L vs. AGES.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IQCY.L nor AGES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQCY.L and AGES.L in my portfolio?

IQCY.L and AGES.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IQCY.L or AGES.L?

On fees, AGES.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQCY.L or AGES.L?

AGES.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IQCY.L.

What is the main difference between IQCY.L and AGES.L?

IQCY.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while AGES.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IQCY.L and 0.40% for AGES.L.