IPSHX vs. COTZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund (IPSHX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX).
IPSHX is managed by Pinnacle. It was launched on Sep 30, 2015. COTZX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 24, 2002.
Performance
IPSHX vs. COTZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IPSHX vs. COTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPSHX Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund | 2.43% | 10.90% | 6.79% | 18.85% | -17.42% | 8.71% | 22.20% | 15.05% | -13.11% | 11.19% |
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | -2.76% | 15.02% | 7.98% | 11.66% | -12.92% | 6.44% | 29.61% | 15.15% | -1.17% | 3.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPSHX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than COTZX's -2.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IPSHX has underperformed COTZX with an annualized return of 6.42%, while COTZX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.95% annualized return.
IPSHX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -6.33%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 4.69%
- 1Y
- 23.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
COTZX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 11.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IPSHX vs. COTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPSHX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than COTZX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IPSHX vs. COTZX — Risk / Return Rank
IPSHX
COTZX
IPSHX vs. COTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund (IPSHX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPSHX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 2.20 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 2.06 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.69 | 10.72 | -3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPSHX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.57 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.95 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.62 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between IPSHX and COTZX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IPSHX vs. COTZX - Dividend Comparison
IPSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than COTZX's 3.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPSHX Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund | 3.24% | 3.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.18% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 3.68% | 6.15% | 0.71% | 0.00% |
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | 3.46% | 3.37% | 3.55% | 2.74% | 3.28% | 14.82% | 6.92% | 5.57% | 4.45% | 3.13% | 2.66% | 4.26% |
Drawdowns
IPSHX vs. COTZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPSHX drawdown since its inception was -25.73%, smaller than the maximum COTZX drawdown of -47.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPSHX and COTZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPSHX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.73% | -47.48% | +21.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.25% | -5.40% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.73% | -17.80% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.73% | -17.80% | -7.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.12% | -3.79% | -3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -3.49% | -4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 1.04% | +1.64% |
Volatility
IPSHX vs. COTZX - Volatility Comparison
Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund (IPSHX) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) at 2.15%. This indicates that IPSHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IPSHX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 2.15% | +3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.49% | 3.41% | +8.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 8.52% | +8.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 7.28% | +7.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 7.35% | +7.57% |