IPOL.L vs. EMXC.L
IPOL.L (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EMXC.L (Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IPOL.L tracks the MSCI Emerging - Poland in Net USD while EMXC.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IPOL.L returned 14.78%/yr vs 10.43%/yr for EMXC.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPOL.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMXC.L.
Performance
IPOL.L vs. EMXC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IPOL.L is traded in USD, while EMXC.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EMXC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPOL.L achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC.L's 23.03% return.
IPOL.L
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 1Y
- 30.84%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
EMXC.L
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -12.05%
- 6M
- 17.76%
- YTD
- 23.03%
- 1Y
- 44.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- —
IPOL.L vs. EMXC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPOL.L iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.81% | 72.75% | -6.10% | 49.20% | -26.61% | 6.83% | 31.60% |
EMXC.L Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc | 23.03% | 53.41% | -3.23% | 22.38% | -23.72% | 1.12% | 72.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPOL.L and EMXC.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between IPOL.L and EMXC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPOL.L vs. EMXC.L — Risk / Return Rank
IPOL.L
EMXC.L
IPOL.L vs. EMXC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPOL.L | EMXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.63 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.74 | 8.66 | -1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPOL.L vs. EMXC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPOL.L drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than EMXC.L's maximum drawdown of -42.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOL.L and EMXC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPOL.L | EMXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -42.21% | -25.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.48% | -16.67% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.43% | -21.96% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.92% | -41.31% | -14.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -13.63% | +10.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.57% | -12.61% | -16.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 5.07% | -0.50% |
Volatility
IPOL.L vs. EMXC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L) is 5.32%, while Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that IPOL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPOL.L | EMXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 10.76% | -5.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.48% | 24.91% | -5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.82% | 27.16% | -2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 22.44% | +7.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 22.23% | +5.17% |
IPOL.L vs. EMXC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPOL.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPOL.L vs. EMXC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IPOL.L nor EMXC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IPOL.L and EMXC.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMXC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMXC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IPOL.L.
IPOL.L tracks MSCI Emerging - Poland in Net USD, while EMXC.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IPOL.L and 0.15% for EMXC.L.
Find the right allocation for IPOL.L and EMXC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer