PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPO.TO vs. LUN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

IPO.TO vs. LUN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in InPlay Oil Corp. (IPO.TO) and Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IPO.TO vs. LUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPO.TO
InPlay Oil Corp.
48.96%32.50%-14.79%-21.88%40.32%847.83%-65.15%-32.65%-49.48%-2.51%
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corporation
17.70%141.31%17.72%35.67%-11.74%-9.34%49.12%40.12%-31.40%32.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IPO.TO:

CA$505.61M

LUN.TO:

CA$29.69B

EPS

IPO.TO:

-CA$0.28

LUN.TO:

CA$1.51

PS Ratio

IPO.TO:

1.78

LUN.TO:

7.75

PB Ratio

IPO.TO:

1.37

LUN.TO:

4.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

IPO.TO:

CA$280.83M

LUN.TO:

CA$3.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IPO.TO:

CA$117.24M

LUN.TO:

CA$1.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

IPO.TO:

CA$103.73M

LUN.TO:

CA$1.72B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPO.TO achieves a 48.96% return, which is significantly higher than LUN.TO's 17.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IPO.TO has outperformed LUN.TO with an annualized return of 100.13%, while LUN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 26.87% annualized return.


IPO.TO

1D
0.67%
1M
18.05%
YTD
48.96%
6M
49.99%
1Y
106.52%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
49.96%
10Y*
100.13%

LUN.TO

1D
10.72%
1M
-20.11%
YTD
17.70%
6M
67.43%
1Y
199.22%
3Y*
59.53%
5Y*
25.04%
10Y*
26.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPO.TO vs. LUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPO.TO
IPO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IPO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IPO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

LUN.TO
LUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPO.TO vs. LUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InPlay Oil Corp. (IPO.TO) and Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPO.TOLUN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.76

3.73

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.25

3.65

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.51

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

5.72

-2.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.93

22.91

-10.98

IPO.TO vs. LUN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the LUN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPO.TO and LUN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPO.TOLUN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

3.73

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.56

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

0.59

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.00

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between IPO.TO and LUN.TO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IPO.TO vs. LUN.TO - Dividend Comparison

IPO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than LUN.TO's 0.32% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPO.TO
InPlay Oil Corp.
5.95%8.71%10.40%8.14%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LUN.TO
Lundin Mining Corporation
0.32%0.59%3.64%3.32%5.66%3.95%1.42%1.55%2.13%1.44%

Drawdowns

IPO.TO vs. LUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPO.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum LUN.TO drawdown of -95.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPO.TO and LUN.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IPO.TOLUN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-95.33%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.04%

-33.67%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.62%

-57.61%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.78%

-57.61%

-40.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.82%

-21.82%

-73.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.37%

-48.47%

-43.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.03%

8.41%

+0.62%

Volatility

IPO.TO vs. LUN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for InPlay Oil Corp. (IPO.TO) is 10.31%, while Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) has a volatility of 22.19%. This indicates that IPO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IPO.TOLUN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.31%

22.19%

-11.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.91%

40.87%

-17.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.87%

53.80%

-14.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.91%

45.41%

+5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40,411.82%

45.84%

+40,365.98%

Financials

IPO.TO vs. LUN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between InPlay Oil Corp. and Lundin Mining Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
70.91M
989.48M
(IPO.TO) Total Revenue
(LUN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

IPO.TO vs. LUN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between InPlay Oil Corp. and Lundin Mining Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
10.6%
29.5%
Portfolio components
IPO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InPlay Oil Corp. reported a gross profit of 7.52M and revenue of 70.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.6%.

LUN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.61M and revenue of 989.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.5%.

IPO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InPlay Oil Corp. reported an operating income of 2.23M and revenue of 70.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

LUN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 278.62M and revenue of 989.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.

IPO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InPlay Oil Corp. reported a net income of 3.04M and revenue of 70.91M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

LUN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 779.09M and revenue of 989.48M, resulting in a net margin of 78.7%.