IPKW vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IPKW (Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IPKW is passively managed, while WBIF is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPKW returned 11.44%/yr vs 5.52%/yr for WBIF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPKW charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

IPKW vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPKW achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than WBIF's 11.61% return. Over the past 10 years, IPKW has outperformed WBIF with an annualized return of 11.44%, while WBIF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.52% annualized return.

IPKW

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 6.08%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: 23.62%
• 5Y*: 9.19%
• 10Y*: 11.44%

WBIF

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 5.70%
• YTD: 11.61%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 23.01%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: 5.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPKW vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPKW Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF	6.08%	45.50%	10.56%	15.12%	-12.81%	11.41%	16.18%	20.26%	-21.59%	34.21%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	11.61%	9.16%	3.43%	0.49%	-8.38%	16.56%	-2.71%	2.68%	-4.68%	19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IPKW and WBIF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014	0.58

The correlation between IPKW and WBIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPKW vs. WBIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPKW	WBIF
Financial Services	32.3%	31.0%
Energy	21.4%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	15.8%	11.1%
Industrials	11.4%	14.6%
Communication Services	6.3%	2.6%
Technology	3.8%	19.9%
Utilities	3.5%	10.3%
Basic Materials	2.9%	1.0%
Real Estate	1.1%	-
Healthcare	1.0%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	0.4%	3.1%

Return for Risk

IPKW vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPKW

IPKW Risk / Return Rank: 54
IPKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IPKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
IPKW Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IPKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IPKW Martin Ratio Rank: 56

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 62
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPKW vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IPKW	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.88	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	2.73	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.34	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	3.50	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.91	12.53	-2.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IPKW vs. WBIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the WBIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPKW and WBIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IPKW	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	1.88	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.19	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.45	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.30	+0.29

Drawdowns

IPKW vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPKW drawdown since its inception was -47.24%, which is greater than WBIF's maximum drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPKW and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPKW	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.24%	-20.29%	-26.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.14%	-6.60%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.77%	-17.16%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.18%	-20.29%	-12.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.24%	-20.29%	-26.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-0.97%	-1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.00%	-7.74%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	1.84%	+0.80%

Volatility

IPKW vs. WBIF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (IPKW) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) at 4.13%. This indicates that IPKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPKW	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	4.13%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.86%	8.63%	+3.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.31%	12.31%	+2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.01%	12.86%	+4.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.91%	12.34%	+5.57%

IPKW vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPKW has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPKW vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

IPKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than WBIF's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IPKW Invesco International BuyBack Achievers™ ETF	3.52%	3.55%	4.12%	2.66%	3.77%	7.37%	1.45%	2.41%	2.61%	0.93%	2.82%	1.31%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPKW and WBIF in my portfolio?

IPKW and WBIF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPKW or WBIF?

IPKW has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to WBIF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPKW dropped -47.24% vs WBIF's -20.29%.

Which ETF is better, IPKW or WBIF?

On 10-year performance, IPKW leads with 11.44% vs 5.52% for WBIF. On fees, IPKW is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, WBIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPKW or WBIF?

Over the 10-year period, IPKW has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPKW or WBIF?

IPKW is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPKW or WBIF?

IPKW has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

What is the main difference between IPKW and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IPKW and 1.25% for WBIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WBIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.