IPDP vs. XQQI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) and XQQI (NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPDP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Innovative Portfolios, while XQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by NEOS. Both are actively managed. IPDP charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XQQI.

Performance

IPDP vs. XQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IPDP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XQQI

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: -4.60%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPDP vs. XQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.54%

Return for Risk

IPDP vs. XQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IPDP	XQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-13.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-6.94%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IPDP	XQQI	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	27.11%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	27.11%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	27.11%	—

IPDP vs. XQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than XQQI's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPDP vs. XQQI - Dividend Comparison

IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.35%.

Position	TTM
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IPDP or XQQI?

On fees, XQQI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPDP or XQQI?

XQQI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPDP or XQQI?

XQQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.35%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between IPDP and XQQI?

IPDP is categorized as Derivative Income, while XQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 0.98% for XQQI.