IPDP vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. IPDP charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

IPDP vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 11.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPDP vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	3.65%

IPDP vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPDP	OMAH
Industrials	45.1%	4.9%
Financial Services	18.6%	37.3%
Healthcare	13.6%	4.4%
Technology	13.1%	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	4.1%
Basic Materials	1.5%	-
Communication Services	-	19.8%
Energy	-	8.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IPDP vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPDP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 51
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 40
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPDP vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPDP	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.44	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.01	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.13	—

Drawdowns

IPDP vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPDP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPDP and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPDP	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-11.83%	+11.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.97%	+1.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-1.27%	+1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IPDP	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.21%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	8.04%	-8.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	13.03%	-13.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	13.03%	-13.03%

IPDP vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPDP vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.05%.

Position	TTM	2025
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.05%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IPDP or OMAH?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPDP or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPDP or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.05%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between IPDP and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 0.95% for OMAH.