IPDP vs. CHPY
IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) and CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. IPDP charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CHPY.
Performance
IPDP vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPY
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 29.53%
- YTD
- 85.77%
- 6M
- 85.49%
- 1Y
- 149.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 65.37% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPDP vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank
IPDP
CHPY
IPDP vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPDP | CHPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 4.83 | — |
Drawdowns
IPDP vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPDP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CHPY drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPDP and CHPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPDP | CHPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -12.17% | +12.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.98% | +1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.18% | — |
Volatility
IPDP vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPDP | CHPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 27.59% | -27.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 33.17% | -33.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 33.17% | -33.17% |
IPDP vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPDP vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison
IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 28.40% | 28.19% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CHPY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 28.40%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 0.99% for CHPY.
Find the right allocation for IPDP and CHPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer