IPDP vs. ARMW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. IPDP charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.

Performance

IPDP vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: 3.44%
• 1M: 128.75%
• YTD: 363.23%
• 6M: 245.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPDP vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	304.38%

IPDP vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPDP	ARMW
Industrials	45.1%	-
Financial Services	18.6%	-
Healthcare	13.6%	-
Technology	13.1%	36.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IPDP vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IPDP	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	4.96	—

Drawdowns

IPDP vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPDP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPDP and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPDP	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-48.47%	+48.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-26.55%	+26.55%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IPDP	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	88.46%	-88.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	88.46%	-88.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	88.46%	-88.46%

IPDP vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPDP vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.20%.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	15.20%	16.38%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IPDP or ARMW?

On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPDP or ARMW?

ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPDP or ARMW?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between IPDP and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 0.99% for ARMW.