PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPBAX vs. EIRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPBAX vs. EIRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPBAX achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than EIRRX's 1.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IPBAX has outperformed EIRRX with an annualized return of 5.11%, while EIRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.81% annualized return.


IPBAX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.61%
YTD
15.33%
6M
15.65%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
5.11%

EIRRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.55%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
3.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPBAX vs. EIRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPBAX
Allspring Real Return Fund
15.33%10.37%8.12%5.35%-10.75%7.74%8.03%9.87%-4.02%4.07%
EIRRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund
1.64%4.63%5.65%6.33%-3.08%7.84%5.25%5.60%-0.15%1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IPBAX and EIRRX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between IPBAX and EIRRX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPBAX vs. EIRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPBAX
IPBAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IPBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IPBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

EIRRX
EIRRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EIRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPBAX vs. EIRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPBAXEIRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.58

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.16

4.48

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.09

18.95

+5.14

IPBAX vs. EIRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPBAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is comparable to the EIRRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPBAX and EIRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPBAXEIRRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

2.57

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

1.31

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

1.38

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.12

-0.41

Drawdowns

IPBAX vs. EIRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPBAX drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, which is greater than EIRRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPBAX and EIRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPBAXEIRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-10.27%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.84%

-0.89%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.58%

-1.67%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.94%

-6.22%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.94%

-10.27%

-3.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.10%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-1.00%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.21%

+0.77%

Volatility

IPBAX vs. EIRRX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX) at 0.45%. This indicates that IPBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPBAXEIRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

0.45%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.00%

1.16%

+4.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.68%

1.55%

+6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.20%

2.84%

+4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.98%

2.76%

+3.22%

IPBAX vs. EIRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPBAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than EIRRX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPBAX vs. EIRRX - Dividend Comparison

IPBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than EIRRX's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIRRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund
4.07%3.57%4.08%4.50%5.07%3.54%2.21%2.66%2.91%2.13%2.24%2.05%
IPBAX
Allspring Real Return Fund
2.26%2.58%2.26%3.71%5.07%3.84%1.26%2.12%2.57%1.96%1.77%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPBAX and EIRRX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPBAX has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to EIRRX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPBAX dropped -15.13% vs EIRRX's -10.27%.

IPBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPBAX and EIRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer