PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPAY vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPAY vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.


IPAY

1D
-4.17%
1M
-9.09%
YTD
-16.45%
6M
-16.03%
1Y
-23.21%
3Y*
1.92%
5Y*
-8.70%
10Y*
5.98%

FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAY vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPAY
ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF
-16.45%-9.55%25.88%18.21%-32.38%-12.72%34.22%41.80%0.17%36.34%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
115.70%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%46.08%61.77%-14.47%32.19%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAY and FTXL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between IPAY and FTXL has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IPAY vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPAY
FTXL

Technology

54.6%
99.5%

Financial Services

41.3%

-

Industrials

4.1%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IPAY
54.6%
FTXL
99.5%

Financial Services

IPAY
41.3%
FTXL

-

Industrials

IPAY
4.1%
FTXL
0.5%

Basic Materials

IPAY

-

FTXL

-

Communication Services

IPAY

-

FTXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

IPAY

-

FTXL

-

Consumer Defensive

IPAY

-

FTXL

-

Energy

IPAY

-

FTXL

-

Healthcare

IPAY

-

FTXL

-

Real Estate

IPAY

-

FTXL

-

Utilities

IPAY

-

FTXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPAY vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAY
IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAY vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPAYFTXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.78

-0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

15.62

-16.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

58.28

-59.71

IPAY vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the FTXL Sharpe Ratio of 6.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAY and FTXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPAYFTXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

6.33

-7.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

0.97

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.94

-0.72

Drawdowns

IPAY vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, which is greater than FTXL's maximum drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPAYFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.75%

-43.87%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.31%

-14.51%

-16.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.74%

-41.57%

+8.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.49%

-43.87%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.51%

0.00%

-39.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-10.56%

-6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.32%

3.88%

+12.44%

Volatility

IPAY vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) is 6.51%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that IPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPAYFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

14.28%

-7.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.19%

28.98%

-10.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.70%

35.94%

-12.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.04%

36.02%

-9.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.38%

34.25%

-8.87%

IPAY vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPAY vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than FTXL's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%
IPAY
ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF
0.94%0.79%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPAY and FTXL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to IPAY (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAY dropped -51.75% vs FTXL's -43.87%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs -8.70% for IPAY. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IPAY has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs -8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IPAY.

IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.

IPAY is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. IPAY tracks Prime Mobile Payments Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IPAY and 0.60% for FTXL.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPAY and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer