IPAY vs. PYPL
IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Prime Mobile Payments Index, while PYPL (PayPal Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IPAY returned 5.98%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for PYPL. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
IPAY vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly higher than PYPL's -26.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IPAY has outperformed PYPL with an annualized return of 5.98%, while PYPL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.12% annualized return.
IPAY
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- -9.09%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 6M
- -16.03%
- 1Y
- -23.21%
- 3Y*
- 1.92%
- 5Y*
- -8.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
PYPL
- 1D
- -4.31%
- 1M
- -15.44%
- YTD
- -26.79%
- 6M
- -30.21%
- 1Y
- -39.94%
- 3Y*
- -12.51%
- 5Y*
- -30.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.12%
IPAY vs. PYPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | -16.45% | -9.55% | 25.88% | 18.21% | -32.38% | -12.72% | 34.22% | 41.80% | 0.17% | 36.34% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | -26.79% | -31.44% | 38.98% | -13.77% | -62.23% | -19.48% | 116.51% | 28.64% | 14.22% | 86.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAY and PYPL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2015 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IPAY and PYPL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPAY vs. PYPL — Risk / Return Rank
IPAY
PYPL
IPAY vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPAY | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.81 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.80 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | -1.45 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPAY | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | -1.03 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | -0.73 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.03 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.01 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
IPAY vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, smaller than the maximum PYPL drawdown of -87.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and PYPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAY | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.75% | -87.30% | +35.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.31% | -49.92% | +18.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.74% | -57.34% | +24.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.49% | -87.30% | +35.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.75% | -87.30% | +35.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.51% | -86.12% | +46.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -35.63% | +18.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.32% | 27.53% | -11.21% |
Volatility
IPAY vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) is 6.51%, while PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that IPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPAY | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 9.62% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.19% | 31.64% | -13.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.70% | 39.02% | -15.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.04% | 42.08% | -16.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.38% | 38.76% | -13.38% |
Dividends
IPAY vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison
IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than PYPL's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | 0.94% | 0.79% | 0.77% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 0.66% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPAY and PYPL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPL has higher volatility (9.62%) compared to IPAY (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAY dropped -51.75% vs PYPL's -87.30%.
IPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.98 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPAY and PYPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer