IPAY vs. BDRY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) and BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPAY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Prime Mobile Payments Index, while BDRY is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IPAY returned -9.21%/yr vs -16.41%/yr for BDRY. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IPAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for BDRY.

Performance

IPAY vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -16.12% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 34.21% return.

IPAY

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -3.52%
• YTD: -16.12%
• 6M: -17.27%
• 1Y: -23.67%
• 3Y*: 2.21%
• 5Y*: -9.21%
• 10Y*: 6.77%

BDRY

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: -7.14%
• YTD: 34.21%
• 6M: 34.67%
• 1Y: 103.63%
• 3Y*: 24.09%
• 5Y*: -16.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAY vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	-16.12%	-9.55%	25.88%	18.21%	-32.38%	-12.72%	34.22%	41.80%	-7.29%
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF	34.21%	44.24%	-47.40%	25.79%	-68.84%	282.99%	-50.16%	-15.92%	-27.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAY and BDRY is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018	0.03

Return for Risk

IPAY vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAY

IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 2
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BDRY

BDRY Risk / Return Rank: 75
BDRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
BDRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BDRY Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BDRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BDRY Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAY vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPAY	BDRY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.00	2.48	-3.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.28	2.90	-4.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.36	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	4.82	-5.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	13.59	-14.95

IPAY vs. BDRY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAY Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the BDRY Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAY and BDRY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IPAY vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, smaller than the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and BDRY.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPAY	BDRY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.75%	-89.16%	+37.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.31%	-21.60%	-9.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.74%	-69.71%	+36.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.49%	-89.16%	+37.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.27%	-71.65%	+32.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.77%	-58.43%	+41.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.46%	7.65%	+9.81%

Volatility

IPAY vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) at 7.30%. This indicates that IPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPAY	BDRY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.88%	7.30%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.78%	29.14%	-10.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.92%	42.10%	-18.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.15%	60.24%	-34.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.39%	62.40%	-37.01%

IPAY vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPAY vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison

IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	0.94%	0.79%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPAY and BDRY in my portfolio?

IPAY and BDRY have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPAY or BDRY?

IPAY has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to BDRY (7.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAY dropped -51.75% vs BDRY's -89.16%.

Which ETF is better, IPAY or BDRY?

On 5-year performance, IPAY leads with -9.21% vs -16.41% for BDRY. On fees, IPAY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BDRY has been the lower-risk option at 7.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPAY or BDRY?

Over the 5-year period, IPAY has performed better with a -9.21% return vs -16.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPAY or BDRY?

IPAY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPAY or BDRY?

IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.

What is the main difference between IPAY and BDRY?

IPAY is categorized as Technology Equities, while BDRY is Commodities. IPAY tracks Prime Mobile Payments Index, while BDRY tracks Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IPAY and 3.76% for BDRY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.