PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPAY vs. AIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IPAY vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IPAY vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IPAY
ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF
-17.75%-9.55%-5.02%
AIS
VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF
10.96%58.35%-4.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -17.75% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 10.96% return.


IPAY

1D
2.51%
1M
-5.29%
YTD
-17.75%
6M
-24.46%
1Y
-18.94%
3Y*
1.41%
5Y*
-8.65%
10Y*
6.12%

AIS

1D
5.94%
1M
-8.03%
YTD
10.96%
6M
19.31%
1Y
94.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IPAY vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IPAY and AIS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

IPAY vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAY
IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

AIS
AIS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAY vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPAYAISDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.69

2.60

-3.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.84

3.09

-3.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.43

-0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

4.94

-5.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.45

17.02

-18.47

IPAY vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the AIS Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAY and AIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPAYAISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

2.60

-3.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

1.33

-1.12

Correlation

The correlation between IPAY and AIS is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IPAY vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

IPAY vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, which is greater than AIS's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and AIS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IPAYAISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.75%

-32.78%

-18.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.31%

-18.75%

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.45%

-10.75%

-29.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.35%

-5.96%

-10.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.05%

5.44%

+7.61%

Volatility

IPAY vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) is 7.11%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 15.90%. This indicates that IPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IPAYAISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

15.90%

-8.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.96%

26.94%

-8.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.48%

36.55%

-9.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.81%

36.11%

-10.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.19%

36.11%

-10.92%