PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPAV vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPAV vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAV achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -7.27% return.


IPAV

1D
-1.21%
1M
-6.36%
6M
3.02%
YTD
6.80%
1Y
15.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-0.61%
1M
-5.92%
6M
-22.32%
YTD
-7.27%
1Y
-0.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAV vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IPAV
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF
6.80%29.77%-6.87%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-7.27%74.16%2.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAV and SHLD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2024

0.33

IPAV vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPAV
SHLD

Industrials

47.1%
87.8%

Basic Materials

29.9%

-

Communication Services

4.0%

-

Energy

1.0%

-

Utilities

0.5%

-

Real Estate

0.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Technology

0.1%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

IPAV
47.1%
SHLD
87.8%

Basic Materials

IPAV
29.9%
SHLD

-

Communication Services

IPAV
4.0%
SHLD

-

Energy

IPAV
1.0%
SHLD

-

Utilities

IPAV
0.5%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

IPAV
0.3%
SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

IPAV
0.1%
SHLD

-

Technology

IPAV
0.1%
SHLD
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

IPAV

-

SHLD

-

Financial Services

IPAV

-

SHLD

-

Healthcare

IPAV

-

SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPAV vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAV
IPAV Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IPAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAV vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPAVSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.01

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

-0.03

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.23

-0.08

+3.32

IPAV vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAV Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAV and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPAV vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAV drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAV and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPAVSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.59%

-25.40%

+10.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

-25.40%

+10.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.88%

-22.99%

+12.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-3.90%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

10.30%

-5.44%

Volatility

IPAV vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) is 5.27%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that IPAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPAVSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

8.28%

-3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.23%

19.79%

-3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.12%

25.12%

-7.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

21.54%

-3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

21.54%

-3.54%

IPAV vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPAV vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

IPAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than SHLD's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IPAV
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF
1.52%1.29%0.31%0.00%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.71%0.55%0.53%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPAV and SHLD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to IPAV (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAV dropped -14.59% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, IPAV leads with 15.68% vs -0.87% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IPAV has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IPAV has performed better with a 15.68% return vs -0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IPAV.

IPAV has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.71% for SHLD.

IPAV is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. IPAV tracks Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IPAV and 0.50% for SHLD.

IPAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPAV and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer