PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPAV vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPAV vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAV achieves a 13.76% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -2.28% return.


IPAV

1D
-0.76%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
13.76%
6M
16.75%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-2.39%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
-2.28%
6M
1.71%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAV vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IPAV
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF
13.76%29.77%-6.87%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-2.28%74.16%1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAV and SHLD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024

0.34

IPAV vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPAV
SHLD

Industrials

47.4%
88.2%

Basic Materials

45.5%

-

Real Estate

3.3%

-

Communication Services

2.6%

-

Energy

1.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

11.8%

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

IPAV
47.4%
SHLD
88.2%

Basic Materials

IPAV
45.5%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

IPAV
3.3%
SHLD

-

Communication Services

IPAV
2.6%
SHLD

-

Energy

IPAV
1.2%
SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

IPAV

-

SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

IPAV

-

SHLD

-

Financial Services

IPAV

-

SHLD

-

Healthcare

IPAV

-

SHLD

-

Technology

IPAV

-

SHLD
11.8%

Utilities

IPAV

-

SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPAV vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAV
IPAV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IPAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAV vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPAVSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.08

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

0.49

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.38

1.30

+6.09

IPAV vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAV and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPAVSHLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

0.41

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

2.00

-0.87

Drawdowns

IPAV vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAV drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAV and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPAVSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.59%

-20.10%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

-20.10%

+5.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-18.85%

+13.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-3.19%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

7.51%

-3.56%

Volatility

IPAV vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) is 6.49%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that IPAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPAVSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

7.81%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

19.35%

-4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.08%

24.05%

-6.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

21.13%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

21.13%

-3.44%

IPAV vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPAV vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

IPAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than SHLD's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IPAV
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF
1.13%1.29%0.31%0.00%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPAV and SHLD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to IPAV (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAV dropped -14.59% vs SHLD's -20.10%.

On 1-year performance, IPAV leads with 29.12% vs 9.71% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IPAV has been the lower-risk option at 6.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IPAV has performed better with a 29.12% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IPAV.

IPAV has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.

IPAV is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. IPAV tracks Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IPAV and 0.50% for SHLD.

IPAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPAV and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer