IPAV vs. PSCI

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

IPAV (Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF) and PSCI (Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - IPAV tracks the Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. Index while PSCI tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IPAV returned 15.97% vs 29.57% for PSCI. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPAV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCI.

Performance

IPAV vs. PSCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAV achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly lower than PSCI's 18.41% return.

IPAV

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -3.87%
• 6M: 6.11%
• YTD: 8.24%
• 1Y: 15.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSCI

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: 10.56%
• YTD: 18.41%
• 1Y: 29.57%
• 3Y*: 20.60%
• 5Y*: 15.12%
• 10Y*: 14.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAV vs. PSCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IPAV Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF	8.24%	29.77%	-6.87%
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF	18.41%	13.50%	5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAV and PSCI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2024	0.61

The correlation between IPAV and PSCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPAV vs. PSCI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPAV	PSCI
Industrials	47.1%	81.5%
Basic Materials	29.9%	1.8%
Communication Services	4.0%	0.3%
Energy	1.0%	1.8%
Utilities	0.5%	-
Real Estate	0.3%	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	4.6%
Technology	0.1%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

IPAV vs. PSCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAV

IPAV Risk / Return Rank: 29
IPAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
IPAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
IPAV Omega Ratio Rank: 29
IPAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
IPAV Martin Ratio Rank: 30

PSCI

PSCI Risk / Return Rank: 49
PSCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PSCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PSCI Omega Ratio Rank: 45
PSCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PSCI Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAV vs. PSCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPAV	PSCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	1.35	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	2.06	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.24	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	1.96	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.36	6.61	-3.25

IPAV vs. PSCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAV Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the PSCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAV and PSCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IPAV vs. PSCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAV drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum PSCI drawdown of -45.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAV and PSCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPAV	PSCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.59%	-45.55%	+30.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.59%	-14.88%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.67%	-4.73%	-4.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.74%	-6.88%	+3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.68%	4.41%	+0.27%

Volatility

IPAV vs. PSCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) is 6.40%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that IPAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPAV	PSCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.40%	6.89%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.11%	16.01%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.99%	21.61%	-3.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.99%	22.98%	-4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.99%	25.22%	-7.23%

IPAV vs. PSCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCI's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPAV vs. PSCI - Dividend Comparison

IPAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than PSCI's 1.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IPAV Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF	1.50%	1.29%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF	1.34%	1.56%	0.65%	0.72%	0.87%	0.69%	0.59%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.74%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPAV and PSCI in my portfolio?

IPAV and PSCI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPAV or PSCI?

PSCI has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to IPAV (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAV dropped -14.59% vs PSCI's -45.55%.

Which ETF is better, IPAV or PSCI?

On 1-year performance, PSCI leads with 29.57% vs 15.97% for IPAV. On fees, PSCI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, IPAV has been the lower-risk option at 6.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPAV or PSCI?

Over the 1-year period, PSCI has performed better with a 29.57% return vs 15.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPAV or PSCI?

PSCI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IPAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPAV or PSCI?

IPAV has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.34% for PSCI.

What is the main difference between IPAV and PSCI?

IPAV tracks Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. Index, while PSCI tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IPAV and 0.29% for PSCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.