PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPAB.DE vs. XYPL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPAB.DE vs. XYPL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IPAB.DE) and Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF (XYPL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAB.DE achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than XYPL.DE's 0.50% return.


IPAB.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.71%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
1.08%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
10Y*

XYPL.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.53%
6M
-0.05%
YTD
0.50%
1Y
1.46%
3Y*
5.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAB.DE vs. XYPL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IPAB.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.36%2.95%4.43%7.23%-0.41%
XYPL.DE
Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF
0.50%3.49%5.30%9.38%-0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAB.DE and XYPL.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2022

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between IPAB.DE and XYPL.DE has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPAB.DE vs. XYPL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAB.DE
IPAB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IPAB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XYPL.DE
XYPL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XYPL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYPL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYPL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XYPL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYPL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAB.DE vs. XYPL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IPAB.DE) and Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF (XYPL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPAB.DEXYPL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.08

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

0.47

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.48

1.56

-0.09

IPAB.DE vs. XYPL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is comparable to the XYPL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAB.DE and XYPL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPAB.DE vs. XYPL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAB.DE drawdown since its inception was -9.09%, smaller than the maximum XYPL.DE drawdown of -9.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAB.DE and XYPL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPAB.DEXYPL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.09%

-9.99%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-3.09%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

-3.09%

+0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-1.24%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-1.92%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.93%

-0.20%

Volatility

IPAB.DE vs. XYPL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IPAB.DE) is 0.79%, while Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Corporate Bond Yield Plus UCITS ETF (XYPL.DE) has a volatility of 1.00%. This indicates that IPAB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYPL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPAB.DEXYPL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

1.00%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

3.21%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

3.61%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.47%

4.63%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.47%

4.63%

-0.16%

IPAB.DE vs. XYPL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAB.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XYPL.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IPAB.DE vs. XYPL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IPAB.DE nor XYPL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IPAB.DE and XYPL.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IPAB.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IPAB.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XYPL.DE.

IPAB.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate Climate Paris Aligned ESG Select, while XYPL.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Corporates Yield Plus. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IPAB.DE and 0.25% for XYPL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPAB.DE and XYPL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer