PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPAB.DE vs. QDVL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPAB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IPAB.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAB.DE achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly higher than QDVL.DE's 0.99% return.


IPAB.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
0.71%
YTD
1.25%
6M
1.44%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
4.79%
5Y*
10Y*

QDVL.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.99%
6M
0.79%
1Y
1.90%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
1.67%
10Y*
0.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IPAB.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc
1.25%2.95%4.43%7.23%-3.20%
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.99%2.86%4.05%4.32%-1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAB.DE and QDVL.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between IPAB.DE and QDVL.DE has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPAB.DE vs. QDVL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAB.DE
IPAB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IPAB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVL.DE
QDVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IPAB.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPAB.DEQDVL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.31

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.36

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.26

8.90

-5.64

IPAB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAB.DE and QDVL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPAB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAB.DE drawdown since its inception was -9.09%, which is greater than QDVL.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAB.DE and QDVL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPAB.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.09%

-8.18%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-0.80%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

-0.80%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-0.73%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.21%

+0.51%

Volatility

IPAB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IPAB.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) at 0.55%. This indicates that IPAB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPAB.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

0.55%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

1.41%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06%

1.71%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

2.03%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

3.10%

+1.40%

IPAB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAB.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVL.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IPAB.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Dividend Comparison

IPAB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDVL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IPAB.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.91%3.04%2.95%1.94%0.31%0.13%0.23%0.27%0.13%0.12%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPAB.DE and QDVL.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVL.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVL.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IPAB.DE.

IPAB.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate Climate Paris Aligned ESG Select, while QDVL.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate 0-3 Sustainable SRI. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IPAB.DE and 0.12% for QDVL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPAB.DE and QDVL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer