IP vs. PG
IP (International Paper Company) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. IP operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, IP returned 3.48%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IP vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IP achieves a -5.93% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IP has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 3.48%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
IP
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- 16.10%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -3.85%
- 1Y
- -17.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.44%
- 5Y*
- -5.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.48%
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -3.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
IP vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IP International Paper Company | -5.93% | -23.83% | 55.31% | 10.20% | -23.05% | 3.48% | 13.83% | 19.47% | -27.72% | 13.13% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between IP and PG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1970 | 0.28 |
The correlation between IP and PG shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IP:
$19.22B
PG:
$361.53B
IP:
-$6.29
PG:
$5.23
IP:
0.77
PG:
4.20
IP:
1.30
PG:
6.70
IP:
$24.97B
PG:
$86.72B
IP:
$7.44B
PG:
$43.64B
IP:
-$41.00M
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IP vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
IP
PG
IP vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Paper Company (IP) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IP | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.97 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.37 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | -0.68 | -0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IP vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IP drawdown since its inception was -90.62%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IP and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IP | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.62% | -54.25% | -36.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.52% | -15.52% | -30.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.61% | -21.15% | -27.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.61% | -23.77% | -24.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.27% | -23.77% | -31.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.82% | -13.29% | -22.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.89% | -12.16% | -8.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.34% | 8.80% | +16.54% |
Volatility
IP vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
International Paper Company (IP) has a higher volatility of 15.74% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.99%. This indicates that IP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IP | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.74% | 6.99% | +8.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.96% | 15.01% | +17.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.63% | 18.78% | +23.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.86% | 17.82% | +15.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.35% | 19.05% | +13.30% |
Dividends
IP vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
IP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than PG's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IP International Paper Company | 5.12% | 4.70% | 3.44% | 5.12% | 5.34% | 4.08% | 4.12% | 4.37% | 4.77% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 4.35% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
IP vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Paper Company and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IP vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
IP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Paper Company reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 5.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
IP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Paper Company reported an operating income of 76.00M and revenue of 5.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
IP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Paper Company reported a net income of 76.00M and revenue of 5.97B, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IP and PG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IP has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IP dropped -90.62% vs PG's -54.25%.
PG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.30 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IP and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer