IOYY vs. TSLR
IOYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF) and TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IOYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IOYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSLR.
Performance
IOYY vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IOYY achieves a -20.70% return, which is significantly higher than TSLR's -35.42% return.
IOYY
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -9.01%
- 6M
- -26.94%
- YTD
- -20.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- 6M
- -31.50%
- YTD
- -35.42%
- 1Y
- 8.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IOYY vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF | -20.70% | -13.50% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -35.42% | -12.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IOYY and TSLR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOYY vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank
IOYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLR
IOYY vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF (IOYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IOYY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IOYY vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOYY drawdown since its inception was -38.47%, smaller than the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOYY and TSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOYY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.47% | -82.80% | +44.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.68% | -66.95% | +31.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.26% | -50.75% | +26.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.61% | — |
Volatility
IOYY vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOYY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 33.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 62.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.06% | 89.66% | -57.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.06% | 115.51% | -83.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.06% | 115.51% | -83.45% |
IOYY vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOYY vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison
IOYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 165.60%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF | 165.60% | 28.55% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IOYY and TSLR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for IOYY.
IOYY has the higher dividend yield at 165.60%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
IOYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLR is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for IOYY and 0.95% for TSLR.
Find the right allocation for IOYY and TSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer