IOPP vs. EWM
IOPP (Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF) and EWM (iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IOPP is a India Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while EWM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Malaysia Index. IOPP is actively managed, while EWM is passively managed. Over the past year, IOPP returned -5.67% vs 22.47% for EWM. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IOPP charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWM.
Performance
IOPP vs. EWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IOPP achieves a -4.15% return, which is significantly lower than EWM's 4.46% return.
IOPP
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- 6M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- -5.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWM
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
IOPP vs. EWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IOPP Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF | -4.15% | 1.86% | 14.31% |
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 4.46% | 15.74% | 17.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IOPP and EWM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2024 | 0.28 |
IOPP vs. EWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IOPP
EWM
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
IOPP
EWM
Financial Services
IOPP
EWM
Consumer Defensive
IOPP
EWM
Industrials
IOPP
EWM
Healthcare
IOPP
EWM
Communication Services
IOPP
EWM
Basic Materials
IOPP
EWM
Technology
IOPP
EWM
-
Energy
IOPP
-
EWM
Real Estate
IOPP
-
EWM
-
Utilities
IOPP
-
EWM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOPP vs. EWM — Risk / Return Rank
IOPP
EWM
IOPP vs. EWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF (IOPP) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IOPP | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.27 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 2.13 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 5.95 | -6.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IOPP vs. EWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOPP drawdown since its inception was -23.67%, smaller than the maximum EWM drawdown of -89.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOPP and EWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOPP | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.67% | -89.19% | +65.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.42% | -10.61% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.46% | -7.68% | -4.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.05% | -31.74% | +22.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.79% | 3.78% | +4.01% |
Volatility
IOPP vs. EWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF (IOPP) is 3.61%, while iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that IOPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOPP | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 4.47% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.64% | 11.36% | +3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.30% | 14.25% | +3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 13.77% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 16.16% | +0.52% |
IOPP vs. EWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOPP has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than EWM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOPP vs. EWM - Dividend Comparison
IOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than EWM's 3.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 3.56% | 3.41% | 3.32% | 3.47% | 3.00% | 6.48% | 1.89% | 2.91% | 3.84% | 5.58% | 5.97% | 37.54% |
IOPP Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF | 0.38% | 0.29% | 6.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IOPP and EWM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWM has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to IOPP (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOPP dropped -23.67% vs EWM's -89.19%.
On 1-year performance, EWM leads with 22.47% vs -5.67% for IOPP. On fees, EWM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, IOPP has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EWM has performed better with a 22.47% return vs -5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for IOPP.
EWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.38% for IOPP.
IOPP is categorized as India Equities, while EWM is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for IOPP and 0.49% for EWM.
EWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IOPP and EWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer