IOO vs. SLV
IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IOO returned 16.70%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IOO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IOO vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IOO achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IOO has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 16.70%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.55% annualized return.
IOO
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- 16.70%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
IOO vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 12.26% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 26.03% | 18.61% | 30.01% | -6.22% | 23.56% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IOO and SLV is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.26 |
IOO vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IOO
SLV
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
IOO
SLV
-
Communication Services
IOO
SLV
-
Financial Services
IOO
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IOO
SLV
-
Healthcare
IOO
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
IOO
SLV
-
Industrials
IOO
SLV
-
Energy
IOO
SLV
-
Basic Materials
IOO
SLV
Utilities
IOO
SLV
-
Real Estate
IOO
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOO vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IOO
SLV
IOO vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IOO | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.35 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 2.62 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.94 | 5.64 | +12.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IOO | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 1.89 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.58 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.49 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.25 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
IOO vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOO | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.85% | -76.28% | +20.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.94% | -42.45% | +32.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -42.45% | +23.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.52% | -42.45% | +18.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.43% | -42.81% | +11.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -37.30% | +35.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.27% | -44.67% | +33.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 19.67% | -17.53% |
Volatility
IOO vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) is 3.81%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOO | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 16.30% | -12.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.59% | 58.31% | -47.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 58.90% | -45.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 36.15% | -19.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 31.84% | -14.06% |
IOO vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOO vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IOO and SLV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, IOO leads with 16.70% vs 15.55% for SLV. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.70% return vs 15.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IOO is categorized as Global Equities, while SLV is Silver. IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IOO and 0.50% for SLV.
IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IOO and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer