PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOO vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IOO vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOO achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IOO has outperformed IAU with an annualized return of 16.70%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively lower 13.31% annualized return.


IOO

1D
-1.33%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.26%
6M
12.43%
1Y
38.24%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
16.70%

IAU

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
2.98%
6M
5.50%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOO vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
12.26%27.02%26.54%27.71%-16.34%26.03%18.61%30.01%-6.22%23.56%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
2.98%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IOO and IAU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005

0.12

The correlation between IOO and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (10 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IOO vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IOO
IAU

Technology

46.2%

-

Communication Services

11.0%

-

Financial Services

9.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Industrials

4.8%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Utilities

0.5%

-

Real Estate

0.2%
100.0%

Technology

IOO
46.2%
IAU

-

Communication Services

IOO
11.0%
IAU

-

Financial Services

IOO
9.1%
IAU

-

Consumer Cyclical

IOO
8.4%
IAU

-

Healthcare

IOO
8.4%
IAU

-

Consumer Defensive

IOO
5.6%
IAU

-

Industrials

IOO
4.8%
IAU

-

Energy

IOO
3.6%
IAU

-

Basic Materials

IOO
1.7%
IAU

-

Utilities

IOO
0.5%
IAU

-

Real Estate

IOO
0.2%
IAU
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IOO vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOO vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IOOIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.24

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

1.69

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.94

4.19

+13.76

IOO vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOO and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IOOIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

1.23

+1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.03

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.84

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.62

-0.23

Drawdowns

IOO vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IOOIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.85%

-45.14%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-19.18%

+9.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-19.18%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-20.93%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

-21.82%

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-17.70%

+16.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-15.96%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

7.71%

-5.57%

Volatility

IOO vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) is 3.81%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that IOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IOOIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

5.50%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

23.02%

-12.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

26.42%

-12.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

17.95%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

15.90%

+1.88%

IOO vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IOO vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
0.82%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


IOO and IAU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to IOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 10-year performance, IOO leads with 16.70% vs 13.31% for IAU. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.70% return vs 13.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IOO.

IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

IOO is categorized as Global Equities, while IAU is Gold. IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IOO and 0.25% for IAU.

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IOO and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer