PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IONZ vs. QQQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IONZ vs. QQQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IONZ achieves a -86.94% return, which is significantly lower than QQQT's 15.19% return.


IONZ

1D
11.28%
1M
22.82%
YTD
-86.94%
6M
-84.33%
1Y
-97.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQT

1D
0.74%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
15.19%
6M
13.80%
1Y
26.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IONZ vs. QQQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IONZ and QQQT is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

-0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IONZ vs. QQQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IONZ
IONZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IONZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONZ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IONZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQT
QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IONZ vs. QQQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IONZQQQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.31

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

2.13

-3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

7.26

-8.54

IONZ vs. QQQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IONZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the QQQT Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IONZ and QQQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IONZ vs. QQQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IONZ drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than QQQT's maximum drawdown of -22.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONZ and QQQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IONZQQQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.66%

-22.50%

-76.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-98.48%

-12.73%

-85.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.85%

-3.85%

-94.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.23%

-3.98%

-70.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

78.39%

3.73%

+74.66%

Volatility

IONZ vs. QQQT - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) has a higher volatility of 53.81% compared to Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) at 8.50%. This indicates that IONZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IONZQQQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

53.81%

8.50%

+45.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

152.53%

13.55%

+138.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

187.36%

16.51%

+170.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

187.10%

20.75%

+166.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

187.10%

20.75%

+166.35%

IONZ vs. QQQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IONZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQT's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IONZ vs. QQQT - Dividend Comparison

IONZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.87%.


PositionTTM20252024
IONZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQT
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
19.87%21.27%10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


IONZ and QQQT have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IONZ has higher volatility (53.81%) compared to QQQT (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONZ dropped -98.66% vs QQQT's -22.50%.

On 1-year performance, QQQT leads with 26.99% vs -97.85% for IONZ. On fees, QQQT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, QQQT has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQT has performed better with a 26.99% return vs -97.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for IONZ.

QQQT has the higher dividend yield at 19.87%, compared with 0.00% for IONZ.

IONZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQQT is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for IONZ and 1.05% for QQQT.

QQQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IONZ and QQQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer