IONX vs. QTAP
IONX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IONX returned -67.50% vs 21.37% for QTAP. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IONX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
IONX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IONX achieves a -62.46% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 14.58% return.
IONX
- 1D
- 12.99%
- 1M
- -43.03%
- 6M
- -45.65%
- YTD
- -62.46%
- 1Y
- -67.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -24.24%
QTAP
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 21.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.33M | $27.72M | $85.53M | |
| $233.87K | $224.64K | $223.31K |
IONX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IONX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF | -62.46% | 80.91% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 14.58% | 22.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IONX and QTAP is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025 | 0.47 |
IONX vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IONX
QTAP
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IONX
QTAP
Basic Materials
IONX
-
QTAP
Communication Services
IONX
-
QTAP
Consumer Cyclical
IONX
-
QTAP
Consumer Defensive
IONX
-
QTAP
Energy
IONX
-
QTAP
Financial Services
IONX
-
QTAP
Healthcare
IONX
-
QTAP
Industrials
IONX
-
QTAP
Real Estate
IONX
-
QTAP
Utilities
IONX
-
QTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IONX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
IONX
QTAP
IONX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF (IONX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IONX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.77 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 7.63 | -8.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 36.59 | -37.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IONX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IONX drawdown since its inception was -94.05%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONX and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IONX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.05% | -29.44% | -64.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.05% | -2.81% | -91.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.44% | -0.17% | -91.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.79% | -4.91% | -48.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.00% | 0.59% | +70.41% |
Volatility
IONX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF (IONX) has a higher volatility of 48.39% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.84%. This indicates that IONX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IONX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.39% | 2.84% | +45.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 136.20% | 5.74% | +130.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.86% | 6.61% | +182.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 197.32% | 18.93% | +178.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 197.32% | 18.57% | +178.75% |
IONX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IONX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
IONX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
IONX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IONX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF | 6.79% | 2.55% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IONX and QTAP have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IONX has higher volatility (48.39%) compared to QTAP (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONX dropped -94.05% vs QTAP's -29.44%.
On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 21.37% vs -67.50% for IONX. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 21.37% return vs -67.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for IONX.
IONX has the higher dividend yield at 6.79%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for IONX and 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IONX and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer