PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IONX vs. ISCMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IONX vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF (IONX) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IONX achieves a 41.84% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 22.87% return.


IONX

1D
-8.85%
1M
97.31%
YTD
41.84%
6M
11.19%
1Y
0.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
22.87%
6M
27.76%
1Y
37.85%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IONX vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IONX and ISCMF is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IONX vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IONX
IONX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IONX vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF (IONX) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IONXISCMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

2.53

-1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

6.69

-6.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.01

15.68

-15.67

IONX vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IONX Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IONX and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IONXISCMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

2.05

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.45

+0.06

Drawdowns

IONX vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IONX drawdown since its inception was -93.75%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONX and ISCMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IONXISCMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.75%

-25.42%

-68.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.75%

-5.69%

-88.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.65%

-5.26%

-62.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.74%

-13.43%

-36.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.55%

2.42%

+60.13%

Volatility

IONX vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF (IONX) has a higher volatility of 59.39% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 7.14%. This indicates that IONX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IONXISCMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

59.39%

7.14%

+52.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

130.91%

15.90%

+115.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

181.50%

18.53%

+162.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

199.14%

14.38%

+184.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

199.14%

14.38%

+184.76%

IONX vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IONX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

IONX vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

IONX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


IONX and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IONX has higher volatility (59.39%) compared to ISCMF (7.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONX dropped -93.75% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 37.85% vs 0.44% for IONX. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 37.85% return vs 0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for IONX.

IONX has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

IONX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for IONX and 0.19% for ISCMF.

ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IONX and ISCMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer