IONQ vs. ZETA
IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) and ZETA (Zeta Global Holdings Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — IONQ in Computer Hardware, ZETA in Software - Application. Over the past 5 years, IONQ returned 42.45%/yr vs 18.73%/yr for ZETA. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IONQ vs. ZETA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IONQ achieves a 36.35% return, which is significantly higher than ZETA's -2.85% return.
IONQ
- 1D
- 5.76%
- 1M
- 17.77%
- YTD
- 36.35%
- 6M
- 32.80%
- 1Y
- 61.68%
- 3Y*
- 84.76%
- 5Y*
- 42.45%
- 10Y*
- —
ZETA
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- 15.01%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 62.58%
- 3Y*
- 29.75%
- 5Y*
- 18.73%
- 10Y*
- —
IONQ vs. ZETA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 36.35% | 7.42% | 237.13% | 259.13% | -79.34% | 57.55% |
ZETA Zeta Global Holdings Corp. | -2.85% | 13.12% | 103.97% | 7.96% | -2.97% | -6.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between IONQ and ZETA is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021 | 0.40 |
Fundamentals
IONQ:
$0.86
ZETA:
-$0.14
IONQ:
105.09
ZETA:
2.28
IONQ:
$187.12M
ZETA:
$1.44B
IONQ:
$71.25M
ZETA:
$881.70M
IONQ:
$405.86M
ZETA:
$50.09M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IONQ vs. ZETA — Risk / Return Rank
IONQ
ZETA
IONQ vs. ZETA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IONQ | ZETA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 1.56 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 3.16 | -1.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IONQ vs. ZETA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IONQ drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than ZETA's maximum drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONQ and ZETA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IONQ | ZETA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.00% | -70.01% | -19.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.61% | -40.37% | -27.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.61% | -70.01% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.00% | -70.01% | -19.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.47% | -46.19% | +20.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.86% | -34.13% | -16.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.23% | 19.85% | +17.38% |
Volatility
IONQ vs. ZETA - Volatility Comparison
IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a higher volatility of 31.85% compared to Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) at 24.86%. This indicates that IONQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZETA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IONQ | ZETA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.85% | 24.86% | +6.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.01% | 48.84% | +20.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.54% | 73.75% | +19.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.55% | 72.06% | +28.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.52% | 72.06% | +25.46% |
Dividends
IONQ vs. ZETA - Dividend Comparison
Neither IONQ nor ZETA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
IONQ vs. ZETA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IonQ, Inc. and Zeta Global Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IONQ and ZETA have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IONQ has higher volatility (31.85%) compared to ZETA (24.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONQ dropped -90.00% vs ZETA's -70.01%.
ZETA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IONQ and ZETA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer