IONQ vs. BAM.TO
IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) and BAM.TO (Brookfield Asset Management Ltd) are both stocks. IONQ operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while BAM.TO operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, IONQ returned 75.90%/yr vs 16.82%/yr for BAM.TO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IONQ vs. BAM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IONQ is traded in USD, while BAM.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BAM.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IONQ achieves a 28.93% return, which is significantly higher than BAM.TO's -8.24% return.
IONQ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 28.93%
- 6M
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 52.88%
- 3Y*
- 75.90%
- 5Y*
- 40.49%
- 10Y*
- —
BAM.TO
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- -8.24%
- 6M
- -10.39%
- 1Y
- -10.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IONQ vs. BAM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 28.93% | 7.42% | 237.13% | 259.13% | -33.14% |
BAM.TO Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | -8.24% | -0.30% | 39.85% | 46.12% | 32.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IONQ and BAM.TO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
IONQ:
$21.48B
BAM.TO:
CA$107.08B
IONQ:
$0.86
BAM.TO:
$1.54
IONQ:
67.11
BAM.TO:
30.56
IONQ:
99.37
BAM.TO:
15.53
IONQ:
4.32
BAM.TO:
8.91
IONQ:
$187.12M
BAM.TO:
$4.94B
IONQ:
$71.25M
BAM.TO:
$3.48B
IONQ:
$405.86M
BAM.TO:
$3.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IONQ vs. BAM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
IONQ
BAM.TO
IONQ vs. BAM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IONQ | BAM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.95 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | -0.41 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | -0.73 | +2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IONQ vs. BAM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IONQ drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than BAM.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONQ and BAM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IONQ | BAM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.00% | -30.47% | -59.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.61% | -30.47% | -37.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.61% | -30.47% | -37.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.53% | -22.77% | -6.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.88% | -9.24% | -41.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.20% | 17.02% | +20.18% |
Volatility
IONQ vs. BAM.TO - Volatility Comparison
IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a higher volatility of 31.60% compared to Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) at 9.74%. This indicates that IONQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IONQ | BAM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.60% | 9.74% | +21.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.80% | 22.20% | +46.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.28% | 29.44% | +63.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.48% | 41.77% | +58.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.53% | 41.77% | +55.76% |
Dividends
IONQ vs. BAM.TO - Dividend Comparison
IONQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM.TO Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | 3.93% | 3.40% | 2.67% | 3.27% |
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
IONQ vs. BAM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IonQ, Inc. and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IONQ and BAM.TO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IONQ and BAM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer