PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ION vs. COPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ION vs. COPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ION vs. COPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ION
Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
9.49%108.37%-12.42%
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
2.61%74.02%4.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ION achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than COPP's 2.61% return.


ION

1D
2.98%
1M
-12.58%
YTD
9.49%
6M
46.23%
1Y
124.76%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
10Y*

COPP

1D
9.20%
1M
-18.73%
YTD
2.61%
6M
29.46%
1Y
86.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ION vs. COPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ION has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than COPP's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ION vs. COPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ION
ION Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ION Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ION Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ION Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ION Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ION Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

COPP
COPP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
COPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
COPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ION vs. COPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IONCOPPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.21

1.93

+1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

2.39

+1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.32

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.26

2.82

+2.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.19

10.92

+9.27

ION vs. COPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ION Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is higher than the COPP Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ION and COPP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IONCOPPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21

1.93

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.88

-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between ION and COPP is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ION vs. COPP - Dividend Comparison

ION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than COPP's 2.31% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
ION
Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
1.46%1.63%1.74%2.23%0.13%
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
2.31%2.37%2.59%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ION vs. COPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ION drawdown since its inception was -52.08%, which is greater than COPP's maximum drawdown of -44.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ION and COPP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IONCOPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.08%

-44.37%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.30%

-28.91%

+5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.04%

-19.51%

+6.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.61%

-14.33%

-10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.07%

7.45%

-1.38%

Volatility

ION vs. COPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) is 15.13%, while Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) has a volatility of 19.84%. This indicates that ION experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IONCOPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.13%

19.84%

-4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.44%

34.18%

-3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.07%

44.97%

-5.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.74%

40.03%

-9.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.74%

40.03%

-9.29%