ION vs. BITU
Compare and contrast key facts about Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU).
ION and BITU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ION is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Nov 29, 2022. BITU is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Apr 1, 2024. Both ION and BITU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ION vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ION vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 9.49% | 108.37% | -15.20% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -47.12% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ION achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -47.12% return.
ION
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -12.58%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 46.23%
- 1Y
- 124.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITU
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- -47.12%
- 6M
- -71.69%
- 1Y
- -52.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ION vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ION has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ION vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
ION
BITU
ION vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ION | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.21 | -0.58 | +3.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | -0.51 | +3.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 0.94 | +0.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.26 | -0.70 | +5.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.19 | -1.35 | +21.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ION | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21 | -0.58 | +3.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | -0.33 | +0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between ION and BITU is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ION vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
ION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than BITU's 78.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.74% | 2.23% | 0.13% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 78.57% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ION vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ION drawdown since its inception was -52.08%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -77.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ION and BITU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ION | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.08% | -77.76% | +25.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.30% | -77.76% | +54.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.04% | -76.35% | +63.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.61% | -31.27% | +6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.07% | 40.22% | -34.15% |
Volatility
ION vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) is 15.13%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 26.13%. This indicates that ION experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ION | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.13% | 26.13% | -11.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.44% | 74.10% | -43.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.07% | 90.36% | -51.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.74% | 99.67% | -68.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.74% | 99.67% | -68.93% |