PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOCT vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IOCT vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IOCT vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IOCT
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October
0.55%18.96%4.88%17.54%0.51%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.44%11.36%-2.18%0.73%-11.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOCT achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than TLTW's 1.44% return.


IOCT

1D
1.79%
1M
-3.76%
YTD
0.55%
6M
2.58%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.22%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
0.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IOCT vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IOCT vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOCT
IOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOCT vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IOCTTLTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

0.84

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

1.17

+0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.15

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

1.42

+0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.65

3.74

+4.92

IOCT vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOCT and TLTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IOCTTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

0.84

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

-0.03

+0.85

Correlation

The correlation between IOCT and TLTW is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IOCT vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

IOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%.


TTM2025202420232022
IOCT
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
13.66%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Drawdowns

IOCT vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOCT and TLTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IOCTTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.94%

-18.61%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-5.80%

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-2.98%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-8.49%

+5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.20%

-0.59%

Volatility

IOCT vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) at 3.46%. This indicates that IOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IOCTTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

3.46%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.00%

5.80%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.21%

8.91%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.38%

11.55%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.38%

11.55%

-2.17%