PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOCT vs. ISWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IOCT vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IOCT vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IOCT
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October
0.55%18.96%4.88%17.54%-6.31%0.98%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
0.94%23.23%-3.96%8.19%-24.93%-0.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOCT achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 0.94% return.


IOCT

1D
1.79%
1M
-3.76%
YTD
0.55%
6M
2.58%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
10Y*

ISWN

1D
2.06%
1M
-6.89%
YTD
0.94%
6M
3.42%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IOCT vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IOCT vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOCT
IOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOCT vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IOCTISWNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

1.35

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

1.86

+0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

1.61

+0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.65

6.68

+1.97

IOCT vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOCT and ISWN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IOCTISWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.35

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

-0.04

+0.87

Correlation

The correlation between IOCT and ISWN is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IOCT vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

IOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


TTM20252024202320222021
IOCT
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.91%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%

Drawdowns

IOCT vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOCT and ISWN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IOCTISWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.94%

-32.35%

+15.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-9.63%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-7.11%

+3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-16.57%

+13.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.32%

-0.71%

Volatility

IOCT vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF- October (IOCT) is 4.41%, while Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that IOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IOCTISWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

6.13%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.00%

8.60%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.21%

11.81%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.38%

11.47%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.38%

11.40%

-2.02%