PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INVN vs. EPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INVN vs. EPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVN achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than EPU's 15.85% return.


INVN

1D
0.96%
1M
8.00%
YTD
3.03%
6M
2.97%
1Y
17.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EPU

1D
-0.17%
1M
6.70%
YTD
15.85%
6M
25.62%
1Y
78.42%
3Y*
45.44%
5Y*
24.32%
10Y*
14.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVN vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
INVN
Alger Russell Innovation ETF
3.03%8.20%
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
15.85%85.24%

Correlation

The correlation between INVN and EPU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INVN vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVN
INVN Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
INVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVN Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
INVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVN Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

EPU
EPU Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVN vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INVNEPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.42

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

3.78

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

11.33

-9.06

INVN vs. EPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the EPU Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVN and EPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INVNEPUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

2.69

-1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.45

-0.11

Drawdowns

INVN vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVN drawdown since its inception was -26.01%, smaller than the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVN and EPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INVNEPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.01%

-60.62%

+34.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.39%

-20.85%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-10.68%

+7.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-18.82%

+11.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.78%

6.94%

+0.84%

Volatility

INVN vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) is 8.25%, while iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a volatility of 9.47%. This indicates that INVN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INVNEPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.25%

9.47%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.42%

25.05%

-7.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.32%

29.32%

-8.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.82%

25.05%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.82%

23.43%

+0.39%

INVN vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

INVN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than EPU's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

INVN vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison

INVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than EPU's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
1.41%1.63%5.78%4.17%5.56%3.13%1.91%2.67%1.53%3.30%0.85%1.90%
INVN
Alger Russell Innovation ETF
0.28%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INVN and EPU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPU has higher volatility (9.47%) compared to INVN (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVN dropped -26.01% vs EPU's -60.62%.

On 1-year performance, EPU leads with 78.42% vs 17.61% for INVN. On fees, INVN is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, INVN has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EPU has performed better with a 78.42% return vs 17.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INVN is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPU.

EPU has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.28% for INVN.

INVN tracks Alger Russell Innovation Index, while EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Alger and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for INVN and 0.59% for EPU.

EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INVN and EPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer