INVG vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INVG (GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - INVG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by GMO, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. INVG is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. INVG charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

INVG vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVG achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return.

INVG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 0.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -12.35%
• YTD: 75.49%
• 6M: 64.35%
• 1Y: 80.94%
• 3Y*: 22.21%
• 5Y*: 25.10%
• 10Y*: 14.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVG vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INVG GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF	0.68%	4.69%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	75.49%	5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between INVG and UGA is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.39

Return for Risk

INVG vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 69
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVG vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INVG	UGA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	0.12	+1.11

Drawdowns

INVG vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVG drawdown since its inception was -3.15%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVG and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	INVG	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.15%	-86.59%	+83.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.88%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	-12.35%	+11.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.71%	-36.76%	+36.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INVG	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	30.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.42%	35.14%	-30.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.42%	34.38%	-29.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.42%	37.27%	-32.85%

INVG vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

INVG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

INVG vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

INVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
INVG GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF	4.68%	2.81%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INVG and UGA in my portfolio?

INVG and UGA have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INVG or UGA?

On fees, INVG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INVG or UGA?

INVG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INVG or UGA?

INVG has the higher dividend yield at 4.68%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

What is the main difference between INVG and UGA?

INVG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: GMO and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for INVG and 0.75% for UGA.