PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INVG vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INVG vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


INVG

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.73%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BPH

1D
1.20%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVG vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between INVG and BPH is -0.89, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

-0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INVG vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

INVG vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INVGBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

9.48

-8.24

Drawdowns

INVG vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVG drawdown since its inception was -3.15%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVG and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INVGBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-2.35%

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

0.00%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-1.08%

+0.37%

Volatility

INVG vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INVGBPHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

25.75%

-21.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.42%

25.75%

-21.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.42%

25.75%

-21.33%

INVG vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

INVG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

INVG vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

INVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


INVG and BPH have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for INVG.

INVG has the higher dividend yield at 4.68%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

INVG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: GMO and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for INVG and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INVG and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer