PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INUTX vs. GSFTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INUTX vs. GSFTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund (INUTX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INUTX achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than GSFTX's 8.01% return. Over the past 10 years, INUTX has underperformed GSFTX with an annualized return of 10.51%, while GSFTX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.46% annualized return.


INUTX

1D
-0.49%
1M
3.29%
YTD
12.81%
6M
13.71%
1Y
27.08%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
10.51%

GSFTX

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.06%
YTD
8.01%
6M
8.45%
1Y
20.67%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
12.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INUTX vs. GSFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INUTX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund
12.81%15.64%14.41%4.88%-1.68%26.09%0.76%23.31%-5.32%12.93%
GSFTX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund
8.01%15.88%15.00%10.57%-4.94%26.26%7.75%28.12%-4.38%20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between INUTX and GSFTX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 1998

0.86

The correlation between INUTX and GSFTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INUTX vs. GSFTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INUTX
INUTX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
INUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
INUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
INUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
INUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GSFTX
GSFTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GSFTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSFTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSFTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GSFTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSFTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INUTX vs. GSFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund (INUTX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INUTXGSFTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.70

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.96

13.96

-1.00

INUTX vs. GSFTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INUTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the GSFTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INUTX and GSFTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INUTXGSFTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.25

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.80

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.80

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.54

+0.07

Drawdowns

INUTX vs. GSFTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INUTX drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, which is greater than GSFTX's maximum drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INUTX and GSFTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INUTXGSFTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.57%

-47.69%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.60%

-5.51%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-13.01%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.15%

-17.01%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.77%

-32.76%

-2.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.36%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-6.37%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.46%

+0.59%

Volatility

INUTX vs. GSFTX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund (INUTX) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) at 2.37%. This indicates that INUTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSFTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INUTXGSFTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.37%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

6.81%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

9.06%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

13.27%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.86%

15.69%

+0.17%

INUTX vs. GSFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INUTX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than GSFTX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

INUTX vs. GSFTX - Dividend Comparison

INUTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than GSFTX's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSFTX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund
5.00%5.35%6.02%4.96%3.87%2.87%1.74%2.90%7.63%4.00%3.77%8.27%
INUTX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund
7.19%8.05%7.27%3.76%7.82%12.77%4.22%12.47%12.99%10.68%3.84%5.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, INUTX and GSFTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

INUTX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to GSFTX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INUTX dropped -55.57% vs GSFTX's -47.69%.

INUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INUTX and GSFTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer