INTW vs. TSYY
INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) and TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INTW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, INTW returned 1617.48% vs -12.29% for TSYY. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INTW charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSYY.
Performance
INTW vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTW achieves a 562.71% return, which is significantly higher than TSYY's -16.60% return.
INTW
- 1D
- 8.89%
- 1M
- 29.41%
- YTD
- 562.71%
- 6M
- 361.23%
- 1Y
- 1,617.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -16.60%
- 6M
- -16.47%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 562.71% | 50.41% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -16.60% | -22.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTW and TSYY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTW vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank
INTW
TSYY
INTW vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INTW | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +11.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 0.96 | +0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 33.18 | -0.45 | +33.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 77.63 | -0.85 | +78.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTW | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42 | -0.39 | +11.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.39 | -0.59 | +3.98 |
Drawdowns
INTW vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTW drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than TSYY's maximum drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTW and TSYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTW | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.58% | -41.52% | -19.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.34% | -27.31% | -22.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.69% | -36.69% | +10.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.07% | -25.88% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.05% | 14.49% | +6.56% |
Volatility
INTW vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a higher volatility of 48.71% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) at 4.86%. This indicates that INTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTW | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.71% | 4.86% | +43.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 111.40% | 19.69% | +91.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 143.36% | 31.77% | +111.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.22% | 37.52% | +107.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.22% | 37.52% | +107.70% |
INTW vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTW has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSYY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTW vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison
INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 282.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 282.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INTW and TSYY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTW has higher volatility (48.71%) compared to TSYY (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTW dropped -60.58% vs TSYY's -41.52%.
On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1617.48% vs -12.29% for TSYY. On fees, TSYY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1617.48% return vs -12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSYY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 282.79%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.
INTW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSYY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for INTW and 0.99% for TSYY.
INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.42 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTW and TSYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer