INTU vs. FSLR
INTU (Intuit Inc.) and FSLR (First Solar, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — INTU in Software - Application, FSLR in Solar. Over the past 10 years, INTU returned 12.10%/yr vs 16.02%/yr for FSLR. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
INTU vs. FSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTU achieves a -51.84% return, which is significantly lower than FSLR's -19.22% return. Over the past 10 years, INTU has underperformed FSLR with an annualized return of 12.10%, while FSLR has yielded a comparatively higher 16.02% annualized return.
INTU
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 18.87%
- 6M
- -36.17%
- YTD
- -51.84%
- 1Y
- -59.29%
- 3Y*
- -13.98%
- 5Y*
- -9.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.08%
FSLR
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -9.07%
- 6M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- -19.22%
- 1Y
- 20.77%
- 3Y*
- 1.35%
- 5Y*
- 19.65%
- 10Y*
- 16.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $397.05M | $406.54M | $591.75M | |
INTU Intuit Inc. | $1.23B | $1.26B | $1.61B |
INTU vs. FSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTU Intuit Inc. | -51.84% | 6.09% | 1.16% | 61.76% | -39.12% | 70.27% | 46.12% | 34.11% | 25.86% | 39.21% |
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | -19.22% | 48.22% | 2.30% | 15.01% | 71.86% | -11.89% | 76.77% | 31.81% | -37.12% | 110.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTU and FSLR is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006 | 0.28 |
The correlation between INTU and FSLR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
INTU:
$86.46B
FSLR:
$22.68B
INTU:
$16.41
FSLR:
$16.22
INTU:
19.26
FSLR:
13.01
INTU:
1.15
FSLR:
0.31
INTU:
4.22
FSLR:
4.22
INTU:
4.23
FSLR:
2.20
INTU:
$20.93B
FSLR:
$5.38B
INTU:
$16.97B
FSLR:
$2.37B
INTU:
$6.65B
FSLR:
$2.28B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTU vs. FSLR — Risk / Return Rank
INTU
FSLR
INTU vs. FSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuit Inc. (INTU) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INTU | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.12 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 0.56 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 1.07 | -2.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INTU vs. FSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTU drawdown since its inception was -75.29%, smaller than the maximum FSLR drawdown of -96.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTU and FSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTU | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.29% | -96.22% | +20.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.28% | -37.40% | -29.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.19% | -59.97% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.19% | -59.97% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.19% | -61.26% | -6.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.41% | -33.69% | -26.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -62.97% | +38.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.92% | 19.41% | +20.51% |
Volatility
INTU vs. FSLR - Volatility Comparison
Intuit Inc. (INTU) has a higher volatility of 14.50% compared to First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) at 10.92%. This indicates that INTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTU | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.50% | 10.92% | +3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.81% | 38.39% | +5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.33% | 53.94% | -6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.29% | 54.12% | -15.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.35% | 50.83% | -16.48% |
Dividends
INTU vs. FSLR - Dividend Comparison
INTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while FSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INTU Intuit Inc. | 1.52% | 0.65% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.72% | 0.38% | 0.57% | 0.74% | 0.83% | 0.89% | 1.08% | 1.09% |
Financials
INTU vs. FSLR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuit Inc. and First Solar, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
INTU vs. FSLR - Profitability Comparison
INTU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.24B and revenue of 8.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
FSLR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported a gross profit of 605.00M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.3%.
INTU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intuit Inc. reported an operating income of 4.02B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.
FSLR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported an operating income of 450.39M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.6%.
INTU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a net income of 3.06B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in a net margin of 35.8%.
FSLR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported a net income of 422.57M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 40.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
INTU and FSLR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTU has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to FSLR (10.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTU dropped -75.29% vs FSLR's -96.22%.
FSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTU and FSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer