INTM vs. VTES
INTM (Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF) and VTES (Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares) are both Municipal Bonds funds. INTM is actively managed, while VTES is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VTES.
Performance
INTM vs. VTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTM achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than VTES's 0.71% return.
INTM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTES
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTM vs. VTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.82% | 4.72% |
VTES Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares | 0.71% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTM and VTES is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTM vs. VTES — Risk / Return Rank
INTM
VTES
INTM vs. VTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) and Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTM | VTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.05 | 1.82 | +1.23 |
Drawdowns
INTM vs. VTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTM drawdown since its inception was -2.65%, which is greater than VTES's maximum drawdown of -2.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTM and VTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTM | VTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -2.42% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.57% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | -0.50% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility
INTM vs. VTES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTM | VTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53% | 1.24% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.53% | 1.72% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.53% | 1.72% | +0.81% |
INTM vs. VTES - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTES's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTM vs. VTES - Dividend Comparison
INTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than VTES's 2.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF | 2.62% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTES Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.99% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INTM and VTES have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTES is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTES is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for INTM.
VTES has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.62% for INTM.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for INTM and 0.07% for VTES.
Find the right allocation for INTM and VTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer