INTM vs. SPMO
INTM (Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INTM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Invesco, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. INTM is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
INTM vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTM achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.45% return.
INTM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 10.84%
- YTD
- 28.45%
- 6M
- 27.50%
- 1Y
- 43.92%
- 3Y*
- 42.27%
- 5Y*
- 23.92%
- 10Y*
- 20.77%
INTM vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.82% | 4.72% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.45% | 4.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTM and SPMO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTM vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
INTM
SPMO
INTM vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.05 | 1.00 | +2.04 |
Drawdowns
INTM vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTM drawdown since its inception was -2.65%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTM and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -30.95% | +28.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -1.46% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | -4.60% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.26% | — |
Volatility
INTM vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53% | 17.70% | -15.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.53% | 19.30% | -16.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.53% | 20.31% | -17.78% |
INTM vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTM vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
INTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF | 2.62% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.66% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INTM and SPMO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for INTM.
INTM has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.66% for SPMO.
INTM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SPMO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for INTM and 0.13% for SPMO.
Find the right allocation for INTM and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer